Commons:Quality images candidates

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.
Purpose
[edit]The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.
Guidelines
[edit]All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.
For nominators
[edit]Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.
Image page requirements
[edit]- Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
- Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
- Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
- No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.
Creator
[edit]- Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.
Technical requirements
[edit]More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.
Resolution
[edit]Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.
Image quality
[edit]Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.
Composition and lighting
[edit]The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.
Value
[edit]Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.
How to nominate
[edit]Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ |}}
The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}
Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.
Number of nominations
[edit]No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.
Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.
Evaluating images
[edit]When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.
How to review
[edit]Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.
- If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.
- If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.
Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.
Grace period and promotion
[edit]If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.
How to execute decision
[edit]QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.
If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.
If promoted,
- Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
- Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
- Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.
- Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.
If declined,
- move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.
- Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
- Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
- Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red
Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)
[edit]Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 19 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.
Consensual review process
[edit]Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.
How to ask for consensual review
[edit]To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.
Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.
Consensual review rules
[edit]See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules
Page refresh: purge this page's cache
Nominations
[edit]Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:
--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 12:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
- Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
- Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
- If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).
|
---|
October 19, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: A photo of the Mitsubishi i-MiEV. --Oq10pass 12:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A photo of the Mitsubishi i-MiEV. --Oq10pass 12:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination The Aperer Freiger in the Stubai Alps, seen from the northwest --Milseburg 11:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Overall very sharp, but the top is blurred ! It's a shame. Go to CR if you want more opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 12:39, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 11:59, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Helmeted guineafowl (Numida meleagris), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Black-headed heron (Ardea melanocephala), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Black-headed heron (Ardea melanocephala), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 11:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:02, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:02, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:02, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:02, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hospital complex in Kłodzko by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:02, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tulipes - Jacques Linard --GoldenArtists 09:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint Hugues stables, part of the former abbey --Benjism89 09:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 09:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - The abbey park and the Fabry tower --Benjism89 09:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Jack of Amboise abbey palace (current town hall) - East facade --Benjism89 09:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:45, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Jack of Amboise abbey palace (current town hall) - The two towers of the East facade --Benjism89 09:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Jack of Amboise abbey palace (current town hall) - The West tower --Benjism89 09:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Monument by the Italian sculptor Temistocle Guerrazzi (1806–1884) in Tomregan Church, Ballyconnell, Co. Cavan, Ireland --AFBorchert 09:10, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
A PC would be good, but now it will be difficult to do it. --Sebring12Hrs 11:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument by the Italian sculptor Temistocle Guerrazzi (1806–1884) in Tomregan Church, Ballyconnell, Co. Cavan, Ireland --AFBorchert 09:10, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 09:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bird Simurgh on Nadir Devanbegi Madrasah, Bukhara --PetarM 09:04, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 09:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: House complex Am Stadion (former educational center and now seat of parts of the city administration) with mosaics by Josep Renau --Romzig 08:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Right side leaning out, left side slightly leaning in --Poco a poco 11:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Josep Renau: "The forces of nature and technology controlled by humans" (wall mosaic in Halle-Neustadt at the Am Stadion building complex) --Romzig 08:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The upper part is pretty unsharp due to perspective correction --Poco a poco 11:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Regensteinmühle near Blankenburg in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 08:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Landscape at Ebersberg near Hohegeiß in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 08:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Stolberg Castle: Access to the castle --Romzig 08:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Italy, Sicily, View on Castellammare del Golfo --Berthold Werner 08:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Milseburg 12:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kaduna South LGA, oranges. By Friday musa. --Lvova 08:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 09:14, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A farmer harvest rice plants from the farm during harvest time. by Photobyamin --Lvova 08:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 09:15, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Garri and fufu processing. By BishopNana. Not the biggest DoF, but cool focus. --Lvova 08:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A telephone booth in the village of Stinik, North Macedonia. By Kiril Simeonovski --Lvova 08:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A stilt house in Lake Dojran. By Kiril Simeonovski. --Lvova 08:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination fruit of – Fruit de Prosopis articulata --Ercé 08:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: fruit of chaste tree – Fruit de Gattilier --Ercé 08:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kazan Zilantov Monastery All Saints Church --Mike1979 Russia 07:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The bottom left is a bit out of focus. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 12:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kazan Zilantov Monastery All Saints Church --Mike1979 Russia 07:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The bottom left is a bit out of focus. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 12:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Ascension Monastery Resurrection Church --Mike1979 Russia 07:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Ascension Monastery Resurrection Church --Mike1979 Russia 07:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Ascension Monastery Resurrection Church --Mike1979 Russia 07:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A female common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis). --Alexis Lours 07:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A female red fox (Vulpes vulpes). --Alexis Lours 07:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A common tern in flight with a fish. --Alexis Lours 07:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A female red fox (Vulpes vulpes). --Alexis Lours 07:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025 ul. Wiślna 7, Kraków, Pałac Dembińskich --Igor123121 07:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Ulica Krakowska 47 --Igor123121 07:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 2025 ul. Franciszańska 3, Kraków, Pałac Biskupi --Igor123121 07:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:04, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination raków, Floriańska 37 --Igor123121 07:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Szczepańska 11 --Igor123121 07:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Moscow. Church of Saint Barbara in Varvarka Street --Alexxx1979 07:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow. Saint Basil's Cathedral --Alexxx1979 07:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bunker 17 in the ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Information board at the Site Security Control Center in the former US special ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Guardhouse and parapet in the ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bunker 26, Special Ammunition Depot Dülmen-Visbeck, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Shelter of the position system, special ammunition depot Dülmen-Visbeck, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Hospital in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romzig 08:53, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hospital in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hospital in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hospital in Kłodzko 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hospital in Kłodzko 5 --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:06, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plocealauda erythroptera (Indian Bushlark) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:45, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plocealauda erythroptera (Indian Bushlark) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:45, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plocealauda erythroptera (Indian Bushlark) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:45, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plocealauda erythroptera (Indian Bushlark) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amandava amandava (Red Avadavat) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dévoluy Massif seen from the Vallon de l'Aup pass (St Julien en Beauchêne, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
@Pline: please, sign the nominations! ~~~~ --Lvova 08:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:50, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Dévoluy Massif seen from the Vallon de l'Aup pass (St Julien en Beauchêne, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dévoluy Massif seen from the Lauteret pass (Dévoluy, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
@Pline: please, sign the nominations! ~~~~ --Lvova 08:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:50, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Dévoluy Massif seen from the Lauteret pass (Dévoluy, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Near the Lauteret pass (Aspres-sur-Buëch, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
@Pline: please, sign the nominations! ~~~~ --Lvova 08:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:50, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Near the Lauteret pass (Aspres-sur-Buëch, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Summit of Garnesier (St Julien en Beauchêne, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
@Pline: please, sign the nominations! ~~~~ --Lvova 08:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:50, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Summit of Garnesier (St Julien en Beauchêne, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autumn colors (St Julien en Beauchêne, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
@Pline: please, sign the nominations! ~~~~ --Lvova 08:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:50, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Autumn colors (St Julien en Beauchêne, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 08:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frogs sculptures, Pod Żabami tenement house in Bielsko-Biała, Poland. --Gower 05:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Façade of basilica in Bochnia, Poland. --Gower 05:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Hedwig cemetery chapel in fog, Chorzów, Poland. --Gower 05:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. I would nominate this for FP. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pegasus statue --Romainbehar 05:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality (slight pink
chromatic aberration on the net on the pedestal). --Gower 06:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower in a park --Romainbehar 05:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:14, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New build bridge of the federal highway 505 over the Nuremberg-Erfurt expressway, view to the north, aerial view --Ermell 05:53, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New build bridge of the federal highway 505 over the Nuremberg-Erfurt expressway, view to the north, aerial view --Ermell 05:53, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Construction site of the Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed rail line in Strullendorf, looking south, aerial view --Ermell 05:53, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New construction of the railway tracks north of Strullendorf, looking north, aerial view --Ermell 05:53, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Overall good, but blacks crushed on the left in forest partially. --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harry Potter, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harry Potter, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good vquality --Michielverbeek 05:40, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Blankenheim in Germany-NRW, street view Am Hirtenturm --Michielverbeek 05:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Blankenheim in Germany-MRW, town gate: the Georgstor --Michielverbeek 05:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Blankenheim, town gate: the Hirtenturm --Michielverbeek 05:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Manhole cover at Proxenou Koromila Street. Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 04:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover at Proxenou Koromila Street. Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 04:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 05:21, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover at Proxenou Koromila Street. Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 04:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover at Proxenou Koromila Street. Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 04:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nieskurzów Stary Reservoir, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 04:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nieskurzów Stary Reservoir, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship --Jakubhal 04:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
--Famberhorst 04:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
-
- Nomination Flowers of Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare). Focus stack of 29 photos.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:59, 19 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Flowers of Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare). Focus stack of 29 photos.
-
- Nomination Flowering heather in heathland in Groote Zand nature reserve in Hooghalen Forestry.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:59, 19 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Flowering heather in heathland in Groote Zand nature reserve in Hooghalen Forestry.
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine in Steinbach (Ebelsbach) --Plozessor 02:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gravestone or epitaph at Saint Mary church in Königsberg in Bayern --Plozessor 02:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poem in "Poets' House" at Bettenburg landscape park --Plozessor 02:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:02, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish Church of the Annunciation in Fichtelberg (Upper Franconia) --Plozessor 02:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stations of the Cross at Abersfeld cemetery, station XII --Plozessor 02:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The parlor at Harewood, near Charles Town, West Virginia, home of Samuel Washington, brother of George Washington --Acroterion 02:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beall-Air, or the Colonel Lewis William Washington House, near Halltown, West Virginia --Acroterion 02:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:03, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beall-Air, or the Colonel Lewis William Washington House, near Halltown, West Virginia --Acroterion 02:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
October 18, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination So called "Italian" fountain in Lower Park of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wall of Venus Garden in Lower Park of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:21, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rudbeckia laciniata in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Too messy composition for me, two species together almost mixed. Flowers aren't very detailed. --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
"two species together" as an argument; I cannot read it, stop it. --Lvova 08:29, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination East Menagerie fountain in Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:18, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apollo fountain statue in East pond of Upper Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture on the facade of the Cultural Hall of Abanca, Carreira do Conde street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, (Spain). --Lmbuga 20:42, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 22:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture on the facade of the Cultural Hall of Abanca, Carreira do Conde street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, (Spain). --Lmbuga 20:42, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 22:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bench in Alameda Park (1870). By Sargadelos, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 20:42, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 22:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window in Feixoo square, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 20:42, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:22, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View from the Mirador de Chío uphill to the volcanic cone Montaña Cascajo in Guía de Isora, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 19:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Good, but dust spots --Lmbuga 20:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bencomia exstipulata in the Garden of the El Portillo Visitor Center in Los Realejos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 19:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 20:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A path along the Isar in the floodplains of the Isar in Marzling --FlocciNivis 19:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
the signpost(?) just peeking into the frame on the right is a bit odd, maybe crop it out? --Acroterion 02:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View to a piece of forest an to the right of it a barn near Untergartelshausen --FlocciNivis 19:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Dust spots, sorry --Lmbuga 20:48, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A sculpture on the barrier of the Plaza de San Marcos in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 19:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romzig 08:51, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A chef is taking out baked potatoes from the oven. By Rogerirakoze --Lvova 19:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Nice done. --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tea harvesting in Rwanda. By Rogerirakoze. --Lvova 19:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A traditional dish from the city of Nalut, Libya. By Ahmed Sh Dridi --Lvova 19:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 20:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A tractor in Nigeria. By Sasu photography. --Lvova 19:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Dust spot in the sky, underexposed, and noisy. And why ISO 400 in bright daylight? --Plozessor 02:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamburg-Neugraben, Francoper Strasse 84, cottage --KaiBorgeest 19:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Augustiańska 26-Węgłowa 4 --Igor123121 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Plac Szczepański 5 --Igor123121 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Remember about limit. You nominated 10 photos today. --Gower 21:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, ul. Jagiellońska 10, Kraków --Igor123121 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Czyncielów, Plac Mariacki 9 --Igor123121 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Kamienica, Ulica Miodowa 15 --Igor123121 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Dome of Church of the Transfiguration at Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 17:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Generally good, but, how about reduction of burned whites and little red halo over the edges? --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Done Let's try so. --Vsatinet 11:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 16:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 16:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:43, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 16:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 16:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kłodzko Hospital 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 16:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Good, but maybe -0,3 EV? --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)@Gover:Fixed--Jacek Halicki 06:44, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lenin on the mosaic "He touched the sleep of the world" by Erich Enge in the western Neustadt in Halle --Romzig 16:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 22:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture of a cherub --ReneeWrites 14:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 15:26, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave relief of Charles Florentine of Salm --ReneeWrites 14:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 15:28, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close-up of the grave relief of Charles Florentine of Salm --ReneeWrites 14:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 15:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Face of sculpture of Charles Florentine of Salm --ReneeWrites 14:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms relief on the tomb of Charles Florentine of Salm --ReneeWrites 14:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ruins of a historic building, Zaraysk, Moscow Region --Никонико962 13:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Generally good, but lacking sharpness a bit + cars on the road --Gower 14:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in St. Paul's Church, Balloughton, Co. Wexford, Ireland --AFBorchert 13:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in St. Paul's Church, Balloughton, Co. Wexford, Ireland --AFBorchert 13:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in St. Paul's Church, Balloughton, Co. Wexford, Ireland --AFBorchert 13:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in St. Paul's Church, Balloughton, Co. Wexford, Ireland --AFBorchert 13:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tall ship 'Alliance' on the Detroit River from Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-30 --Crisco 1492 13:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 13:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tall ship 'Alliance' on the Detroit River from Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-30 --Crisco 1492 13:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Well composed --Gower 14:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tall ship 'Alliance' on the Detroit River from Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-30 --Crisco 1492 13:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 13:44, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tall ship 'Alliance' on the Detroit River from Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-30; detail of bow --Crisco 1492 13:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Very good, but tilted a bit. --Gower 14:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tall ship 'Alliance' on the Detroit River from Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-30; detail of stern --Crisco 1492 13:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christmas decorations, Garrett Street, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 13:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Good, but how about brighten it? --Gower 14:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
I think you're right, the whites were a bit subdued. Uploaded a new version, thanks! --Julesvernex2 19:26, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Gower 21:26, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christ on the Cross (Philippe de Vries), Church of Santa Maria de Belém, Mosteiro dos Jerónimos, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 13:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romzig 08:50, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapter house, Mosteiro dos Jerónimos, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 13:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 13:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cordoned off exercise machines during the COVID-19 lockdown, Alameda Dom Afonso Henriques, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 13:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 22:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cordoned off park benches and table during the COVID-19 lockdown, Alameda Dom Afonso Henriques, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 13:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romzig 08:49, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Packard 120 B Convertible Coupe at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 11:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 13:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Nissan Kicks (P16) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 11:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Nissan original three Pike Cars in the Nissan Heritage Collection --TTTNIS 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 13:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nissan four Pike Cars in the Nissan Heritage Collection --TTTNIS 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 13:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 1984 Nissan Prairie JW-G --TTTNIS 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2023 Toyota Alphard Hybrid X E-Four --TTTNIS 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 2023 Toyota Alphard Hybrid X E-Four --TTTNIS 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mini Hatch (J01) John Cooper Works in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Tiguan III in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 13:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nissan Kicks in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 13:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel above the gatekeeper's house, Rizopolozhensky Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 11:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 13:48, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Burnay Mosque --Mike1979 Russia 10:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 10:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Tikhvinskaya Church --Mike1979 Russia 10:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 10:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Peter and Paul Cathedral Window --Mike1979 Russia 10:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 13:48, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Peter and Paul Cathedral --Mike1979 Russia 10:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romzig 08:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Peter and Paul Cathedral Top --Mike1979 Russia 10:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 10:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chor Minor mosque, Bukhara, Uzbekistan --PetarM 10:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:52, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bay of Kotor at Stoliv / Montenegro --Imehling 10:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Horizon seems tilted. --Sebring12Hrs 12:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Backside of Njegoš mausoleum with view on Cetinje --Imehling 10:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:10, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Gatekeeper's house with chapel and Holy Gate of Rizopolozhensky Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 09:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Would be good, but I can't get past the person bent over in the foreground. --Acroterion 02:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bells on the Bell Tower of Rizopolozhensky Monastery, Suzdal. By Alexander Novikov --Vsatinet 09:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Bells are too dark (with some minor CA's on them) and the background landscape is too soft. Not QI in my eyes, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 22:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - The Dauphine fountain --Benjism89 09:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:48, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Lamartine street, one of the main streets in the town center --Benjism89 09:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:48, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Achleiten Castle, Kematen an der Krems in Upper Austria --Isiwal 09:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
There's a dust spot above the roof of the left house. --Imehling 10:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC) - Review
Per Imehling. --Sebring12Hrs 11:20, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Done thanks for review--Isiwal 18:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Another dust spot to remove. I added image note, where it is. --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Done another dust spot eliminated --Isiwal 09:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Achleiten Castle, Kematen an der Krems in Upper Austria --Isiwal 09:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Meander of the Krems River, Nußbach (Upper Austria). --Isiwal 09:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Village Strienzing, Wartberg an der Krems in Upper Austria --Isiwal 09:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hartheim Castle in Alkoven in Upper Austria --Isiwal 09:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, there is a big dust spot in the upper left area. And I would also clone the bird on the right side away. --Syntaxys 13:44, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Done thanks for review--Isiwal
-
- Nomination Ashy starling (Lamprotornis unicolor), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Only part of head is in good proper focus. --Gower 14:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Support A little noisy, focus is a little more on the body and less sharp on the head. But I've seen much worse get approved. --Polinova 14:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lesser flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor) and greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 10:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lesser flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Not sharp enough for resting birds. --E bailey 15:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Sharpened why do you force me to move to CR after an improvement instead of leaving a comment asking for improvement, what is the hurry to decline images that can be easily improved? Don't get it. --Poco a poco 11:45, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock formation, Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 10:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 13:46, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --E bailey 15:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain with four nymphs --Romainbehar 07:28, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Statues of apostles and evangelists on top of cathedral --Romainbehar 07:28, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025 pl. Wszystkich Świętych 11, Kraków --Igor123121 06:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 2025, Kraków, pl. Wolnica 13 --Igor123121 06:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kraków, Floriańska 39 --Igor123121 06:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025,Kraków, Kamienica, Ulica św. Wawrzyńca 11-Gazowa 1 --Igor123121 06:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025, ul. Gołębia 24, Kraków, Collegium Novum Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego --Igor123121 06:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 10:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 5 --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar of the Roman Catholic pilgrimage church of St. Mark in Küstersgreuth --Ermell 06:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar of the Roman Catholic pilgrimage church of St. Mark in Küstersgreuth --Ermell 06:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Roman Catholic pilgrimage church of St. Mark in Küstersgreuth --Ermell 06:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freight train near Eltmann on the Bamberg-Rottendorf railway line below the Martin Winery wine house --Ermell 06:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Organ loft in Christuskirche church in Haßfurt --Ermell 06:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Margot Hildebrandt gravestone (actually leaning), Chorzów evangelical cemetery--Gower 05:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close-up of Świetlik statue in Bytom--Gower 05:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dwunastu Apostołów erratic boulders in Puck, Poland.--Gower 05:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Blankenheim in Germany-NRW, castle (Schloss Blankenheim) with river (Ahr) in the front --Michielverbeek 05:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Left side leaning in --Poco a poco 07:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Done Perspective correction --Michielverbeek 19:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blankenheim in Germany-NRW, Burg Blankenheim from the Rathausplatz --Michielverbeek 05:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Gower 07:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Blankenheim in Germany-NRW, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Mariä Himmelfahrt --Michielverbeek 05:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Superman, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Superman, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good qua;ity --Michielverbeek 05:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A male common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis). --Alexis Lours 05:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality (little red
chromatic aberration but overall well done). --Gower 05:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A northern lapwing (Vanellus vanellus). --Alexis Lours 05:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Very good quality. --Gower 05:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A male little bittern in flight. --Alexis Lours 05:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Impressive --Gower 05:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A common tern in flight with a fish. --Alexis Lours 05:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Gower 05:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A female red fox (Vulpes vulpes). --Alexis Lours 05:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Gower 05:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: what remain of the Facade of 5 street Luxembourg In Tunis IssamBarhoumi 05:44, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed, and I know it's a narrow street, but the light is very infortunate. --Sebring12Hrs 11:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
--Famberhorst 04:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
-
- Nomination Pseudibis papillosa (Red-naped Ibis) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 04:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pseudibis papillosa (Red-naped Ibis) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 04:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amandava amandava (Red Avadavat) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 04:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amandava amandava (Red Avadavat) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 04:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 04:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motor Tanker RIVAGE. ENI 2104768. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal near the lock complex to the IJsselmeer.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Motor Tanker RIVAGE. ENI 2104768. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal near the lock complex to the IJsselmeer.
-
- Nomination Bolsward. Martinikerk (Bolsward). Pipe organ in the Martinikerk.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Bolsward. Martinikerk (Bolsward). Pipe organ in the Martinikerk.
-
- Nomination Buoy tender “Norden” in the harbour, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 04:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 04:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stumbling stones for Friedrich, Rebecka, and Henry Hoffmann at Bismarckstraße 4, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Groyne at Dovetief, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. (Should be nominated to FP) --Tisha Mukherjee 04:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beach hotel “Georgshöhe,” Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brihadisvara Temple during Maha Shivaratri. By User:Rainer Halama --UnpetitproleX 03:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pothupara Waterfalls - Munnar. By User:Rainer Halama --UnpetitproleX 03:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 04:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eravikulam National Park - Munnar - Tea Plantations. By User:Rainer Halama --UnpetitproleX 03:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old farmhouse in Reichenbach (Nagel) --Plozessor 03:20, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 04:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Passenger cruise shp, American Spirit, docked at Port Angeles, Washington USA. --GRDN711 00:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
October 17, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Former Finnish Girls School in Vyborg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 23:48, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building in Vyborg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 23:48, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential buildings in Vyborg, Russia. By User:Kora27 --Екатерина Борисова 23:48, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Druzhba Hotel in Vyborg, Russia. By User:Kora27 --Екатерина Борисова 23:48, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rose in Private Dacha park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:48, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jardin Koffi & Diabaté à Cotonou --Fawaz.tairou 21:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Jardin Koffi & Diabaté à Cotonou --Fawaz.tairou 21:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:20, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lever de soleil sur l'Esplanade de l'amazone à Cotonou --Fawaz.tairou 21:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Needs perspective correction, otherwise ok --Plozessor 03:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ancien comptoir commercial colon à Ouidah --Fawaz.tairou 21:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Comment Perspective distortion --Jakubhal 04:20, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common starling ruffling its feathers while foraging in Tiergarten, Berlin, Germany --Lrkrol 20:27, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 04:15, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chilies drying in Bhutan --CreativeC 19:59, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 20:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of northern of Phobjika Valley --CreativeC 19:46, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The top of the mountain is cut. --Sebring12Hrs 20:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Khewang Lhakhang in the Phobjika valley of Bhutan --CreativeC 19:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review @CreaativeC: good quality but requires vertical perspective correction. Can you edit to fix it? --UnpetitproleX 03:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The restored sculpture Transcendiendo la imposición del cuerpo in Plaza Luis de León Huerta, Icod de los Vinos, Tenerifer, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Dactylis metlesicsii in the Garden of the El Portillo Visitor Center in Los Realejos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The memorial stone dedicated to the electrician Hans Sedlmeier, who died in an accident trying to repair a power line on the 06.24.1909, in Marzling --FlocciNivis 17:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
why cut at the bottom? --Gower 20:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The sculpture Camouflage by Kitra in the Völklingen Ironworks --FlocciNivis 17:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support A little bit too soft outside the colorful object, but that object is in focus. --Lvova 11:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti of a spray can in Ingelheim am Rhein --FlocciNivis 17:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:26, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Ulica Augustiańska 15 --Igor123121 17:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Rynek Główny 11 --Igor123121 17:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:38, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Rynek Główny 15 --Igor123121 17:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Rynek Główny 9 --Igor123121 17:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Synagoga Wysoka, Ulica Józefa 38 --Igor123121 17:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Superb starling (Lamprotornis superbus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Polinova 17:33, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lesser flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor) and greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Not sharp --Екатерина Борисова 23:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
I applied more sharpness --Poco a poco 08:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
I'm still not ready to say that this image is sharp enough. --Екатерина Борисова 22:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lesser flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor) and greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Not sharp --Екатерина Борисова 23:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
I applied more sharpness --Poco a poco 08:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
I'm still not ready to say that this image is sharp enough. --Екатерина Борисова 22:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lesser flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor) and greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Not sharp --Екатерина Борисова 23:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
IMHO over the bar, still I applied more sharpness --Poco a poco 08:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Flamingos in the foreground are blurry and the flock in the background look like a pink something with lack of details. Feel free to send it to CR section if you disagree. --Екатерина Борисова 22:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lesser flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor) and greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It's a pity, but this one is not sharp enough too. --Екатерина Борисова 23:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
IMHO over the bar, still I applied more sharpness --Poco a poco 08:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
I'm still not ready to say that this image is sharp enough. --Екатерина Борисова 22:38, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Porsche 992 Turbo coupe in Böblingen --Alexander-93 17:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-AMG A236 in Böblingen --Alexander-93 17:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination :Lamborghini Urus SE in Böblingen --Alexander-93 17:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:26, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Aston Martin Vantage Roadster (2024) at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 17:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 1952 Volkswagen Type 1 Cabriolet at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 17:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:26, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cais das Colunas during the COVID-19 lockdown, Praça do Comércio, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Gower 17:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cais das Colunas during the COVID-19 lockdown, Praça do Comércio, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cais das Colunas during the COVID-19 lockdown, Praça do Comércio, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cais das Colunas during the COVID-19 lockdown, Praça do Comércio, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination COVID-19 lockdown protests, Jardim da Praça de Londres, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Gower 17:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An American Dipper seen in Lake Berryessa, California --Polinova 15:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, it lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 17:27, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Black-billed magpie seen in Boulder, Colorado --Polinova 15:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It needs air on the right, far too tight --Poco a poco 17:27, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
@Poco a poco Right or left side? I can recrop. --Polinova 17:33, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, left side, of course --Poco a poco 12:40, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Done What do you think now @Poco a poco? --Polinova 14:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Föhrenleiten, a village in Kremsmünster, Upper Austria --Isiwal 13:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Partially overexposed, too bright. --Gower 13:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Comment respect your opinion, but IMO it's fine the way it is. Feel free to decline--Isiwal 18:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rock formation "Kerzenstein" in Pesenbach valley, Upper Austria. --Isiwal 13:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
strongchromatic aberration to fix --Gower 13:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
DoneCA and noise removed, thanks for review --Isiwal 18:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watzinger Chapel, Gallneukirchen, Upper Austria --Isiwal 13:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
color noise to fix --Gower 14:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Per Gower, color noise and CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)I withdraw my nomination no access to original file - deleted already --Isiwal 19:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic branch church of St. Ubald in Sautern, Upper Austria --Isiwal 13:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 13:45, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 in the cour d'honneur of the Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 13:29, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Lamborghini Huracan 2015 in the cour d'honneur of the Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 13:29, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Braunschweig: Friedrich Huneborstels Haus am Burgplatz --JoachimKohler-HB 12:45, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 12:49, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2 Szpitalna Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:20, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2 Szpitalna Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:20, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Administration building at Kłodzko Hospital 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:19, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Administration building at Kłodzko Hospital 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 12:49, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Administration building at Kłodzko Hospital 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:19, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mihrab Mosque Zitouna in Tunisia with Imams --IssamBarhoumi 09:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Haidra Train Station in Kasserine --IssamBarhoumi 09:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 10:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC) dear Sebring12Hrs I improve the light --IssamBarhoumi 21:19, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Antic water Citern In Kef --IssamBarhoumi 09:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Previously unassessed. --Lvova 09:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Efremov - 2025 - Tilia tree --Юрий Д.К. 08:33, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
chromatic aberration and burned whites to fix --Gower 13:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Will be fixed --Юрий Д.К. 05:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow - 2025-9 - Four Seasons Hotel --Юрий Д.К. 08:33, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Dust in the right upper corner --Mike1979 Russia 09:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Gower 14:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
I've decided to remove it, althought this is most likely small cloud as dust spots almost always have round shape. Юрий Д.К. 05:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Support Thank you. I thought it was some kind of dirt, not a cloud of smoke. --Mike1979 Russia 07:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Moscow - 2025 - facade of the House on the Embankment (close-up) --Юрий Д.К. 08:33, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus). --Alexis Lours 08:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A common tern in flight. --Alexis Lours 08:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 08:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A female little bittern. --Alexis Lours 08:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Beautiful --Gower 08:32, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Allegory of art statue --Romainbehar 07:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:58, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Allegory of science statue --Romainbehar 07:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:49, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Iris-T SLM by Diehl Defense at ILA Berlin Air Show 2024 --MB-one 06:46, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
There is to much empty foreground and the shadows need a little brightning IMO --JoachimKohler-HB 12:35, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tallinn Bus Festival 2022 --MB-one 06:46, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Not a good perspective imo --Brihaspati 12:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
@Brihaspati: please! do NOT! use /Discussion instead of /Comment. Discussion means 'someone supported, I'm against it' or in reverse. 1 person is commenting, not discussing! :)) Lvova 18:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santenay (Côte-d'Or, France) - Church of Our Lady of the Rosary --Benjism89 06:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santenay (Côte-d'Or, France) - Church of Our Lady of the Rosary - Portal --Benjism89 06:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santenay (Côte-d'Or, France) - Town hall --Benjism89 06:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santenay (Côte-d'Or, France) - Water Jet square --Benjism89 06:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santenay (Côte-d'Or, France) - Former train station building, now a tourist office --Benjism89 06:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window of Tomregan Church, Ballyconnell, Co. Cavan, Ireland. This is a combination of HDR and panorama based on 140 individual shots. --AFBorchert 05:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:56, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination East window of Tomregan Church, Ballyconnell, Co. Cavan, Ireland. --AFBorchert 05:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Presbytery of Tomregan Church, Ballyconnell, Co. Cavan, Ireland --AFBorchert 05:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Transept of Tomregan Church, Ballyconnell, Co. Cavan, Ireland --AFBorchert 05:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Potter wasp on fragrant rock rose --Ermell 05:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 05:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Honey bee (Heriades truncorum) on an anemone flower in a garden in Bamberg --Ermell 05:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 05:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common bee beetle (Trichodes apiarius) on bishop's weed (Ammi majus) in a garden in Bamberg --Ermell 05:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 05:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Polinova 17:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulpit of St. Michael's Church (Hellingen) in the district of Hildburghausen --Ermell 05:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 05:59, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan St. Nicholas Cathedral --Mike1979 Russia 05:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Pisa tower vibes. --Lvova 10:48, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
This tower is not vertical in reality. --Mike1979 Russia 11:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Polinova 17:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Ioanno-Predtechensky Monastery Bell Tower --Mike1979 Russia 05:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:45, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Ioanno-Predtechensky Monastery Archimandrite Building --Mike1979 Russia 05:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 05:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan St Nicholas Gostinodvorskaya Сhurch --Mike1979 Russia 05:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 05:56, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Signpost on the promenade, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buoy tender “Norden” in the harbour, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:40, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Picket fence at the White Dune, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:00, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Groyne at Dovetief, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. en mooi.--Famberhorst 05:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Left valve of a Virgate Tellin, Tellinella virgata --Llez 05:22, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bolsdorf in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Margaretha --Michielverbeek 05:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Kerpen, tower of Burg Kerpen in Germany RP --Michielverbeek 05:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Niederehe in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Leodegar --Michielverbeek 05:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Niederehe in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Leodegar --Michielverbeek 05:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clouds over the Mountainsides of Breil-Brigels (Graubünden).
--Famberhorst 04:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Clouds over the Mountainsides of Breil-Brigels (Graubünden).
-
- Nomination Berries from a Mahonia aquifolium shrub. Focus stack of 19 photos.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 16:01, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Berries from a Mahonia aquifolium shrub. Focus stack of 19 photos.
-
- Nomination Katowice, Dom Powstańca Śląskiego. --Gower 04:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good qua;ity --Michielverbeek 05:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church ruins in Ziemięcice (the tower is really tilted). --Gower 04:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:28, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:45, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2 Szpitalna Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 04:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture on the facade of the Cultural Hall of Abanca, Carreira do Conde street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, (Spain). --Lmbuga 00:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 04:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
October 16, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Altar of Saint Catherine in Hoogstraten --ReneeWrites 23:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:17, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture of Charles Florentine of Salm --ReneeWrites 23:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:00, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Studio-workshop in Abramtsevo estate, Moscow Oblast, Russia. By User:Елена Нечипоренко --Екатерина Борисова 22:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 23:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church of Rohr, Upper Austria --Isiwal 21:50, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 23:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms on the façade of the College of San Xerome, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 20:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Dolmen de Pech-Lapeyre in commune of Limogne-en-Quercy, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 18:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Dolmen de Pajot in commune of Limogne-en-Quercy, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 18:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Szczepańska 6 --Igor123121 16:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga 20:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
@Lmbuga:Done --Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025 ul. Sławkowska 23, Kraków, 3 --Igor123121 16:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The balcony is overexposed --Poco a poco 20:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga 20:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
@Lmbuga:Done --Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025 ul. Franciszańska 3, Kraków, Pałac Biskupi, 4 --Igor123121 16:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga 20:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
@Lmbuga:Done --Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz C174 350 4Matic at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 15:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Good, but blacks crushed. --Gower 07:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peruvian booby --Polinova 14:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Can you please enter the location? --Poco a poco 20:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
@Poco a poco Added location to description. --Polinova 21:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Support Ok, I added the cats myself --Poco a poco 17:49, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hyundai Ioniq 5 N in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 14:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Volkswagen Taos in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 14:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Acura ILX in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 14:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Tiguan III in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 14:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2017 Toyota Voxy ZS Kirameki --TTTNIS 14:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2020 Toyota Voxy ZS Kirameki II --TTTNIS 14:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 2020 Toyota Voxy ZS Kirameki II --TTTNIS 14:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: BMW i7 Protection at IAA Summit 2023 in Munich, Germany --MB-one 13:29, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Stairs inside a Neoplan Skyliner Autwärter Edition at Busworld Europe 2025 --MB-one 13:29, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Carrer de Watt in Barcelona --MB-one 13:29, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 14 Okrzei Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 16a Okrzei Street in Kłodzko by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Not sure what the subject is here. I don't see a street, the building is hidden behind a cropped tree --Poco a poco 20:21, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Manhole cover at 28 Oktovriou street. Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 08:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kazan St. Nicholas Cathedral --Mike1979 Russia 08:03, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kazan Nikolo-Nizskaya Church --Mike1979 Russia 08:03, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Very nice, but how about adding more bottom if you can? --Gower 08:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Space added. --Mike1979 Russia 08:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazan Nikolo-Nizskaya Church --Mike1979 Russia 08:03, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:08, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination East window in St. Paul's Church, Balloughton, Kilcavan, Co. Wexford, Ireland --AFBorchert 07:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
I don't know this church but WB looks a bit warm to me. Otherwise good --Benjism89 16:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
@Benjism89: This is due to the color of the stained glass windows in this church. --AFBorchert 16:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Yes, probably, but it still needs to be fixed. Adjusting WB is often hard in a church because there multiple sources of light with different warmth, but here (and in your two other pictures of this church), I believe cooling a little bit the WB should make it bettter --Benjism89 06:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Done. --AFBorchert 07:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Support Much better now, thanks ! --Benjism89 09:22, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in St. Paul's Church, Balloughton, Kilcavan, Co. Wexford, Ireland --AFBorchert 07:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
I don't know this church but WB looks a bit warm to me. Otherwise good --Benjism89 16:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
White balance has been changed. --AFBorchert 07:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Gower 14:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Paul's Church, Balloughton, Kilcavan, Co. Wexford, Ireland --AFBorchert 07:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
WB looks a little warm to me, otherwise good --Benjism89 16:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
White balance has been changed. --AFBorchert 07:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Benjism89 09:22, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cross-section, wood of loop-root mangrove - bois de Rhizophora mucronata --Ercé 07:20, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
*Comment the symbol for the centimeter requires the lowercase letter according to the International System. Excellent otherwise. --Harlock81 14:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Reset to "/Promotion". --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:10, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Per Harlock81, lowercase needed in "cm". Easily fixable --Benjism89 09:26, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 11 Okrzei Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Strong highlights and very distorted (look at the car at the bottom right) --Benjism89 16:22, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Garden pavilion interior --Romainbehar 06:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
I think sharpness and noise are acceptable for an image taken in difficult conditions. But there are huge CAS on the tindow on the right, and composition isn't optimal (the statue basis on the left should be entirely visible) --Benjism89 16:07, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
PC is needed at right and CAs on the window, per Benjism89. --Sebring12Hrs 21:54, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Superb starling (Lamprotornis superbus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Borderline sharpness but acceptable IMO. But there are large CAs that need to be fixed --Benjism89 16:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
True,Done --Poco a poco 19:25, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:32, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Dohm in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Remigius --Michielverbeek 05:16, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Near tower's cross there is a dust on sky to remove. Chceck perspective too, tower is slightly leaning, but maybe is isn't perfect in situ? --Gower 06:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Done Removed dust and small perspective improvement --Michielverbeek 07:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Aekingerzand Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Dead Birch (Betula) fallen in a heathland pond.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC) - Review
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Too bright. --Gower 06:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
*:@Gower *Done, Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 12:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Aekingerzand Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Dead Birch (Betula) fallen in a heathland pond.
October 15, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Zeyerova Street in Karlovy Vary --Perituss 23:33, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Sedlo Pass in Durmitor National Park / Montenegro --Imehling 20:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. (only minor purple
chromatic aberration at right lower corner) --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Church of the Kazan Icon of the Theokostos in Knyaginin Monastery, Vladimir --Vsatinet 19:20, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Cathedral of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Knyaginin Monastery, Vladimir --Vsatinet 19:20, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Crushed blacks, clipped whites --Gower 06:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Actually not, details in shadows and highlights are present. Although the ability to see them, of course, depends on the capabilities of the output device (monitor settings and characteristics, etc.). Okay, let's consider the option with lower contrast in the shadows (I don't see any issues in the highlights, anyway). --Vsatinet 17:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 19:09, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Dust spot. See note. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 12:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Rynek Główny 9 --Igor123121 19:09, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Downscalled --Lmbuga 19:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
@Lmbuga:Done --Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too much chroma noise to me. Please discuss. And please can you stop to cancel the votes please ? --Sebring12Hrs 12:34, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Pałac Pokutyńskich, Ulica Karmelicka 29 --Igor123121 19:09, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
The top is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 20:52, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Downscalled --Lmbuga 19:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
@Lmbuga:Done --Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The top is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 12:33, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View from a bridge across Isarwerkkanal the with the sculpture Der Isarflößer on its left shore --FlocciNivis 16:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Too bright for me. --Gower 06:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kazan Azimov Mosque --Mike1979 Russia 07:52, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Tilted a little --Gower 11:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Tried to fix. New version. --Mike1979 Russia 09:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santenay (Côte-d'Or, France) - View from the Sène hill : vineyards, Haut-Santenay and the village of Santenay --Benjism89 06:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Could you fix perspective? Right big building is tilted --Gower 11:18, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
You're right, it's fixed --Benjism89 18:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: please check again --Benjism89 09:22, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Büdesheim in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul --Michielverbeek 05:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Titled. Perspective correction needed. --E bailey 03:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Panixersee (Lag da Pigniu) above Andiast. Reservoir and surroundings in backlight.
--Famberhorst 04:28, 15 October 2025 (UTC) - Review
Blacks are crushed. --Gower 16:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
*Done, Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 04:53, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Panixersee (Lag da Pigniu) above Andiast. Reservoir and surroundings in backlight.
October 14, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Villa Petridi, Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 22:15, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
There is a lens flare. --Sebring12Hrs 22:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Balcony of Hermitage pavilion, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Window of Hermitage pavilion (view from the ground), Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Needs perspective correction --E bailey 03:51, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 21:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Strong hightlights and large CAs, both probably fixable --Benjism89 21:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A street in Lomonosov --Lvova 18:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: West wall of Muhammad Aminkhan Madrasah, Khiva, Uzbekistan --PetarM 17:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Tower is distorted and not sharp, strong white CA's on the right side. Fixable? --Екатерина Борисова 21:32, 14 October 2025 (UTC) @Екатерина Борисова Можно, я даю оригинал, он мне лучше. --PetarM 09:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Italy, Sicily, Cefalù, Cathedral --Berthold Werner 15:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Could you reduce clipped whites/blacks? Otherwise it's OK. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. Ok to me like that. --Sebring12Hrs 11:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Italy, Sicily, Cefalù, Cathedral --Berthold Werner 15:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Could you reduce redchromatic aberration and clipped whites/blacks? Otherwise it's OK. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
I don't see tha CAs, but PC is needed at left, ok for the right... --Sebring12Hrs 11:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Done Please check again. --Berthold Werner 13:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 2014 Mitsubishi eK Space Custom G --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Rear view of 2013 Daihatsu Tanto Custom RS --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 1995 Nissan Primera 2.0Tm S Selection --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kazan Voronkov — Kalyagin House --Mike1979 Russia 08:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Could you reduce clipped whites/blacks? Otherwise it's OK. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Tried to fix. New version. --Mike1979 Russia 08:49, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kazan Bauman Str 45 House --Mike1979 Russia 08:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Blooming heathland on a heathland in the Groote Zand nature reserve in the Hooghalen Forestry Department.
--Famberhorst 04:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Blooming heathland on a heathland in the Groote Zand nature reserve in the Hooghalen Forestry Department.
-
- Nomination: Bust of Captain Anselmo Belloso, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 03:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Could you reduce blue/violetchromatic aberration and fix tilt? --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks. --Rjcastillo 00:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Tilted still --Gower 12:30, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Done. --Rjcastillo 22:18, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
October 13, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: The former Union and New Haven Trust Building, located at 205 Church Street in New Haven, ConnecticutI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Kzirkel 16:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The perspective correction does not seem right to me. The building, especially the upper part, appears to be leaning backwards. A suggestion: perhaps this would not occur when editing with Gimp.--Lmbuga 21:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ingalls Ice Rink (Yale Hockey)I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Quintinsoloviev --Kzirkel 16:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Good composition. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) from Samsun, Turkey. --Ömer selim 16:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Frog itself is distracted by foliage. --Gower 16:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025 Pomnik Grunwaldzki w Krakowie --Igor123121 16:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Tilted --Poco a poco 18:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Tilted a bit. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025 Kraków, Kościół św. Idziego w Krakowie --Igor123121 16:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Crushed blacks (a lot!), big round dust spot on the church's wall. Little bluechromatic aberration. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Nissan Leaf (ZE2) at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 15:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Italy, Sicily, Cefalù, Chiesa del Purgatorio --Berthold Werner 15:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
There too much purple CAs to me. --Sebring12Hrs 17:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Valves in an abandoned factory --Grunpfnul 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
I understand the concept but only the valve taps are in focus. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
So go to CR... --Sebring12Hrs 12:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Analog Photography - City of Ghent, Three Towers --Grunpfnul 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The sky is very noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 18:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Also an analog Photography… it’s Not Noise what you see --Grunpfnul 02:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Catherine's Church in Hoogstraten --ReneeWrites 12:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Light is not very beautiful and bottom crop is not well done so I cannot support this photo, a weak decline sorry --Michielverbeek 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
How about darkening the backgroud a bit? --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Cyan CAs on the tail below the branch. Also on the top left. Grey halo on the branches to the left of the monkey.--Lmbuga 16:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
I've cropped it and got rid of some benches, but I haven't seen any CA --Poco a poco 18:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
I have left two notes on the image to mark where they are clearer. I find it surprising that you cannot see them.--Lmbuga 20:44, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Now, also, spots to the left of the monkey --Lmbuga 20:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the notes. I removed it. Quite frankly that feedback belongs in the pixelpeeing category in my eyes. --Poco a poco 19:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
I don't understand what ‘pixel peeing’ is. It seems like I've done something wrong. Are you accusing me of something? Pee on your photo or something like that?--Lmbuga 11:44, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
I'm giving up. I won't comment on this photo again. --Lmbuga 11:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View of a Quicksilver boat at Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 10:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Pedestrian zone in Thessaloniki. I prefer not to crop to show this empty sunny area. --Lvova 09:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 09:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Nice, but why so small? --Lvova 15:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 09:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Nice, but why so small? --Lvova 15:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 09:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Nice, but why so small? --Lvova 15:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Gallicrex cinerea in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Nice, but bright and low areas partially clipped. Could you fix it? --Gower 07:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)@Gower: I have tried to fix it and uploaded a new version, thank you. -- Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Blacks are still clipped partially, only bright background is darker --Gower 15:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pelm in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Willibrord --Michielverbeek 05:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Noise - grainy in sky. Upper part of church spire is stretched and distorted due to perspective correction. It's a tough angle to shoot from and not have some lens distortion that's hard to correct in editing. --E bailey 04:02, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Groyne at Dovetief, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Is there a focus? You play with art effects, so I would prefer to ask... --Lvova 18:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Focus is in the beginning, the bolt and the wood. --XRay 04:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
October 12, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: EURO 2024 Festival in Frankfurt am Main --MB-one 19:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Siuri Damodar Temple Terracotta --Sumitsurai 18:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A platform on the Oranienbaum I station --Lvova 16:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: On a fish market in Thessaloniki --Lvova 16:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Škoda Epiq Showcar at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Dark areas, especially the shadow under the car, are noisy. --Lvova 09:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Amandava amandava (Red Avadavat) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
@Tisha Your 3 nice bird pics: You have privided uploads with very less pixels, why? --2015 Michael 2015 09:12, 12 October 2025 (UTC)@2015 Michael 2015: That much is left after cropping the image to desired frame. It's a very small bird and we always don't get the opportunity get enough close so cropping is the only option. -- Tisha Mukherjee 07:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 08:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Nice, but try reduce bluechromatic aberration (no offence) --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 08:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Poor categorization, tilted (look at the background) --Poco a poco 11:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
October 11, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Partial view of Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. --Vitorperrut555 23:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Nice, but tilted, can you fix it? --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Zespół Skankan na Ostróda Reggae Festival w 2025Ja, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencji --KrzysztofPoplawski 16:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Clipped in bright areas (too bright) --Gower 17:26, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
bright regions on the skin - fixed --KrzysztofPoplawski 13:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
I am not convinced. Redchromatic aberration and that cropped guy aren't good. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Himalayan tahr in Sagarmatha National Park. By User:Gurung pratap --UnpetitproleX 16:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
the details seem blurred partially, it it a question of post-processing? --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
I realise there were other issues as well, such as WM, will renominate a fixed version shortly. UnpetitproleX 17:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower:Done. Please check now. --UnpetitproleX 17:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Nothing changed, it's the same file. --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Please compare carefully, this (nom) and this (prev) are definitely not the same file (see for instance the head position, the watermark in bottom left, the difference in resolution etc.) UnpetitproleX 00:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
yes, it's a different picture, and you uploaded it after my previous comment. --Gower 18:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)I withdraw my nomination, will renominate. UnpetitproleX 03:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gate Church of the Annunciation at Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 16:43, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but please remove the wooden roof in the left corner --Michielverbeek 08:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment I think this part of roof is quite appropriate in the frame. Let's wait for other opinions. --Vsatinet 11:12, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Support IMO this roof makes the whole composition a bit more interesting. --Екатерина Борисова 00:16, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 15:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Slight barrel distortion. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower:Done --Igor123121 18:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Tilt increased and resolution decreased… --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: The resolution is the same, I don’t understand your criticism. As for nitpicking every little detail - does the photo really look bad? Is the perspective that bad? I don’t know how I could improve it any further. --Igor123121 20:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)--Sebring12Hrs 12:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose No, the resolution is not the same, per Gower. You take very interresting pictures, but downscale them is not good.
@Sebring12Hrs:Done --Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Purple CAs in the trees. --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 15:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Too bright, bright areas clipped --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower:Done --Igor123121 18:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
why resolution declined from 4000 × 6000 to 2088 × 2600? --Gower 20:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: Because in my opinion, the photo looks better at that resolution. --Igor123121 20:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)--Sebring12Hrs 12:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Per Gower ! Downscaled again, it does not look better at this resolution. If you have the full resolution, It is not mandatory to open the image at full size.
@Sebring12Hrs:Done --Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The bottom of the graves are blurred and there are blown highlights. --Sebring12Hrs 12:29, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 15:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Left gravestone strongly burned out (clipped) --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower:Done --Igor123121 18:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
It's the same picture with clipped areas but cropped. Grave is also partially clipped. --Gower 20:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: The photo focuses on the grave of Otto Hodak, which is not cropped. As for Professor Filipiak’s overexposed tomb, I did as much as I could. --Igor123121 20:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)--Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Downscaled.
@Sebring12Hrs:Done --Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View from Zedernweg to the Church of St. Petri in Wörlitz --Romzig 13:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Looks tilted, shadows are too dark --Poco a poco 14:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Yenidze in Dresden, seen from the Heinz-Steyer-Stadion --Romzig 09:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Quite good but very underexposed --Benjism89 11:09, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the reviews. The light was poor when I took the photos. I've already adjusted the brightness quite a bit, but I don't think anything more would make sense. I like it, even if it's a bit dark. --Romzig 11:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eiffel tower at night reflecting in the Seine in Paris, France (2) --Giles Laurent 08:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment The picture is slightly tilted to the left --Imehling 11:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Imehling:Done, what do you think now? -- Giles Laurent 20:15, 16 October 2025 (UTC) Thanks. The Eiffel tower looks more upright now. --Imehling 08:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Birds flying around a traffic circle in Mysore, Karnataka, India (2024) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
It needs noise removal and a perspective correction --Poco a poco 14:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Issues not fixed. --E bailey 04:06, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lakshmi Narayana Temple, Hosaholalu, Karnataka, India (2020) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Maybe vertical perspective correction? --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Celestowska, Ulica Mikołajska 10 --Igor123121 06:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Nice, but I suggest horizontal PC to achieve parallel view. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: I understand, I’ll try next time. I hope this photo is correct. --Igor123121 18:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)--Sebring12Hrs 12:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Downscaled.
@Sebring12Hrs:Done --Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support A bit blurred at the bottom left, but above the QI bar. --Sebring12Hrs 12:26, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Open wing Nectaring activity of Papilio clytia Linnaeus, 1758 - Common Mime ( Form - dissimilis) . By User:Sandipoutsider --Atudu 02:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Blue CAs on the right wing, this can easily be corrected --Syntaxys 02:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
I am also waiting forchromatic aberration reduction. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
October 10, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Beach umbrealls stacked at the end of the season in Sarti, Chalkidiki, Greece --Kritzolina 19:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Highlights clipped. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025. Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego, Plac Świętego Ducha --Igor123121 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC correction needed, tilted a bit. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower:Done --Igor123121 18:52, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Better but still not parallel everywhere --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Waterfall at Karura Forest, Nairobi, Kenya --Brihaspati 06:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Too much saturation,chromatic aberration near white areas, colour noise in shadows. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: uploaded a new version by changing saturation and sharpness.--Brihaspati 09:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Brihaspati 06:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Change nomination note, please. Describe the picture. --Gower 17:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Both rhinos are not sharp and partly covered by grass. --Екатерина Борисова 21:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
October 9, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Storozhevaya Tower from the village of Torgovishche, Suksunsky district: Khokhlovka, Perm district, Perm Krai.--AlixSaz 15:39, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Toom much sky, maybe different cropping? --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
The sky is OK here, but bottom part of the image is blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 11:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025 Poznań, Okrąglak w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Good quality. --Llez 05:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Crooked a bit, correctio needed. --Gower 05:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower:Done --Igor123121 13:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Still PC not corrected well. --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)--Sebring12Hrs 12:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Downscaled.
@Sebring12Hrs:Done --Igor123121 17:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment I don't understand. The PC is not better than fisrt version to me. Thanks for the resolution it is good now. --Sebring12Hrs 12:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
October 8, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination View along the Hotel Añaza in Acorán, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Interesting motif and subject, but the horizon is not horizontal. Please, check also the verticality after having rotated the image. --Harlock81 19:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Done --FlocciNivis 14:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Interesting. --Gower 15:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
October 6, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Dom Długosza w Krakowie --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Composition doesn't highlight the main theme: door --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. And the main topic here is definetely not a door, but a portal. Lvova 09:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Portal of course, not the door, but photo was cropped in the meantime --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: @Lvova:Done --Igor123121 12:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
October 5, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kamienica (schronisko brata Alberta) --Igor123121 07:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs:Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for your effort, perspective is ok, but the crop is may be too tight. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)chromatic aberration to reduction (sky) --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower:Done --Igor123121 15:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose
Not done --Gower 20:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
October 4, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Participants of ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2025 entering Alte Brücke ("Old Bridge") in Heidelberg --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Half of image is the road, not very pretty composition. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Done cropped in significantly. Thanks for the review --MB-one 09:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Better composition, maybe you should add personality rights template also? --Gower 20:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025 Przemyśl, Pałac biskupów gr.-kat., Plac Tadeusza Czackiego 3 w Przemyślu --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective correction needed, vertical lines of a building aren't parallel --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Done --Igor123121 17:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
'Hieroglyphic artifacts' in dark parts of tree/bush at front. --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower:Done --Igor123121 15:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Façade detail, Avenida Fontes Pereira de Melo 39, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 04:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Quite dark --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
I think you're right, uploaded a brighter version, thanks! --Julesvernex2 20:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Gower 20:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
October 3, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: 2025 Kraków, Warneńczyka 10-Rejtana 15 --Igor123121 04:55, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed. Look at the verticals at left (red/orange building) and may be a bit underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs:Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Could you increase exposure a bit ? --Sebring12Hrs 20:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
A bit dark. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Done --Igor123121 17:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
The sky is now completly posterized. --Sebring12Hrs 21:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs:Done --Igor123121 15:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
September 26, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Christo Botewa street, view from E, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 07:58, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Probably it's possible to crop the right side - there is a PC problem and anyway this lifting edge is just sticking out. --Lvova 20:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
@Lvova:Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Probably you didn't upload it. --Lvova 08:53, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Visibly tilted. --Gower 08:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose
Oppose
Not done --Gower 20:06, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]Rules
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using
{{support}}
or{{oppose}}
will make it easier to count your vote. - Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add
Oppose and
Support if necessary.
- Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
File:Bay_of_Kotor_-_Sveti_Dorde.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sveti Đorđe island in Bay of Kotor / Montenegro --Imehling 10:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose The monastery is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 12:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- I would like to have a discussion about that. --Imehling 15:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Punakha_Dzong_behind_vegetation.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Punakha Dzong --CreativeC 19:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support A horse is cut, but it's absolutely not the first thing we see there, so QI. --Lvova 11:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. Cut off head of the horse spoils the image though this horse is not the main subject. Let's hear other opinions. --Екатерина Борисова 22:33, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Entrance_archway_to_the_Ranakpur_temple.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Entrance archway to the Ranakpur temple --CreativeC 19:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 11:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not so bad, but the edges are a bit blurred, especially at left and the crop is borderline. I would like to hear other opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 12:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
SupportI wish the symmetry was dealt better but otherwise OK to me. --UnpetitproleX 02:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Tirthankara_in_Kayotsarga_(standing)_position_with_two_apsaras_at_Ahmedabad,_Gujarat.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tirthankara in Kayotsarga (standing) position with two apsaras having Kalasha outside at Chaumukhji Pol in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India --Brihaspati 12:28, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Too small resolution under obligatory 2 Mp. --Gower 13:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not ready to support this image, but its new version has more than 6mpx, so the reason why Gower declined it is wrong now. --Екатерина Борисова 22:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Kazan_Ioanno-Predtechensky_Monastery_Bell_Tower_2024-07-14_1714.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Kazan Ioanno-Predtechensky Monastery Bell Tower --Mike1979 Russia 05:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Unfortunate bottom crop and point of view. I understand that it's very hard to avoid wires taking photos in a big city, but nethertheless wires here are very disturbing, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree. The main subject is visible in its entirety. There's still plenty of space below. The fence isn't the subject of the photo, and parts of it don't obscure the main subject. Long wires hang between the buildings above the fence, and it's impossible to avoid them. The bottom edge of the photo was chosen to avoid parked cars, which would further clutter the image. Discuss, please. --Mike1979 Russia 08:01, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Hillesheim,_Stadtbefestigung_Dm_en_de_katholische_Pfarrkirche_Sankt_Martin_Dm_IMG_5151_2024-08-31_12.00.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Hillesheim in Germany-RP, town fortifications and the catholic church Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin --Michielverbeek 05:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- The image is QI, but the family should be cloned out IMO. --Syntaxys 05:47, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Famils isnt't very distracting, and no personality rights violated due to resolution of faces. --Gower 07:16, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- A discussion has already been started so I put to discuss --Michielverbeek 19:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- QI. I like the contrast between the family and the castle. It is not a postcard, it is an illustrative image. Lvova 08:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
File:ClapperRailStGeorgeIsland.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Clapper rail seen on St. George Island State Park --Polinova 14:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Sorry, but it is noisy, the focus is on the bird's chest, not its head. --Lvova 10:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Москва,_ул._М._Никитская,_6_стр._5_(3).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Balcony of Ryabushinsky House, Moscow, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 22:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- PC needed --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely not. The horizons here are horizontal, the verticals are vertical, and everything else has an irregular shape in real life (see in the category). --Екатерина Борисова 03:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Template:Undone Verticals aren't vertical, it's undeniable here, sorry. --Gower 15:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- "undeniable" is a very strong expression for the balcony above the Art Nouveau-style porch, which has a complex shape and therefore does not look vertical. I still advise to look at the other images in the category before making any decisions. --Екатерина Борисова 23:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely not. The horizons here are horizontal, the verticals are vertical, and everything else has an irregular shape in real life (see in the category). --Екатерина Борисова 03:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Treibräder_&_Kuppelstangen_der_DB_01_1063_(Braunschweig,_2019).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Driving wheels and coupling rods of the DB 01 1063 --JoachimKohler-HB 12:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose impressive but lacks sharpness, blacks crushed partially --Gower 13:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Other opinions? --JoachimKohler-HB 18:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Overall sharpness not adequate. --Plozessor 08:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Common_Kingfisher_2025_08_30_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A female common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis). --Alexis Lours 08:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Oppose. A little overexposed and while the beak is sharp, much of the body is not. --GRDN711 14:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Definitely good quality. Lvova 10:55, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Egyptian_goose_2025_09_12.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A juvenile egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiaca). --Alexis Lours 08:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. Great! --Gower 08:27, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose
Support Good quality. It is okay that things that are not the subject are out of focus. The subject is sharp and in focus.--Polinova 15:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Honestly curious how this can be considered not sharp enough on the main subject. Increasing the DOF would reduce the separation with other subject. I'm also fairly certain this highly passes the bar of QI in terms of sharpness. --Alexis Lours 21:28, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Polinova. Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support This is QIC, not FPC, so we should not nitpick. Good quality --Jakubhal 04:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good. --Plozessor 08:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:23, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Lvova 10:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_Kraków,_Muzeum_Książat_Czartoryjskich,_Ulica_Pijarska_(7).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Muzeum Książat Czartoryjskich, Ulica Pijarska --Igor123121 19:09, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
--Sebring12Hrs 11:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Downscaled.
- I think you downscale your images to hide overprocessing artifacts, but it is not the good method to me. --Sebring12Hrs 11:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs:
Done
Support new version is improved. Good quality. --E bailey 04:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It lacks detailsat right. --Sebring12Hrs 12:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_Kraków,_Kościół_Świętej_Trójcy,_Ulica_Krakowska_48_(83).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kościół Świętej Trójcy, Ulica Krakowska 48 --Igor123121 16:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga 19:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- See versions --Lmbuga 19:48, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Lmbuga --Jakubhal 04:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose below expectations, lacking detail, noise in dark areas. --Gower 20:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga: @Jakubal: @Peulle:
Done Igor123121 17:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good enough for me now --Jakubhal 04:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok now. --Sebring12Hrs 12:06, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_ul._Gołębia_24,_Kraków,_Collegium_Maius_Uniwersytetu_Jagiellońskiego,_11.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, ul. Gołębia 24, Kraków, Collegium Maius Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego --Igor123121 16:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Downscaled --Jakubhal 19:50, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Jakubhal: no rule forbids reducing the resolution of images. All it says is "it should not be done" or that "the non-downsampled version is preferred" - but that is not the same as a prohibition. --Igor123121 20:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Jakubhal. It may not seem like a prohibition, but what it certainly is not is permission to always do so. --Lmbuga 20:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unless there is good reason, photos should be uploaded with as high a resolution as possible.--Peulle 07:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose ugly compression artifacts on the sky. --Gower 20:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga: @Jakubal: @Peulle:
Done Igor123121 17:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok Jakubhal 04:10, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support This is not a prohibition to downscale images, but we don't like it... But now it is better. --Sebring12Hrs 10:45, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Kraków,_Floriańska_11_(2).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Kraków, Floriańska 11 --Igor123121 04:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga 21:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Lmbuga. It's like you are using a 2000s camera. --Sebring12Hrs 11:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs. Nasty artifacts, especially in dark parts. --Gower 20:01, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga: @Sebring12Hrs:
Done Igor123121 16:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_Kraków,_Ratusz_na_Kazimierzu,_Plac_Wolnica_(1).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ratusz na Kazimierzu, Plac Wolnica --Igor123121 04:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga 21:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
--Sebring12Hrs 11:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Per Lmbuga. It's like you are using a 2000s camera.
Oppose Ok but I didn't notice that there are a lot of blurred areas, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 10:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Lmbuga. + too much bottom and spire is cut--Gower 19:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga: @Sebring12Hrs:
Done Igor123121 17:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Back light so facade is dark. Tip of tower is cut off. Sorry. --Imehling 10:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_Kraków,_Rynek_Główny_9_(2).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Rynek Główny 9 --Igor123121 04:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga 21:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
--Sebring12Hrs 11:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Per Lmbuga. It's like you are using a 2000s camera.
Oppose low texture quality: color noise and maybe compression? --Gower 19:59, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga: @Sebring12Hrs:
Done Igor123121 17:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Doesn't look so bad in my view. --Imehling 10:08, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Now ok, thanks. --Sebring12Hrs 10:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_Kraków,_Barbakan,_Planty_(12).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Barbakan, Planty --Igor123121 04:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga 21:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
--Sebring12Hrs 11:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Per Lmbuga. It's like you are using a 2000s camera.
Oppose Per Lmbuga. Low quality: noise and artifacts on bricks,
chromatic aberration, compression? --Gower 19:56, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga: @Sebring12Hrs:
Done Igor123121 17:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Light could be better but overall quality is ok in my view. --Imehling 10:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Now ok. --Sebring12Hrs 10:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_Kraków,_cmentarz_wojskowy_przy_ul._Prandoty_(część_Cmentarza_Rakowickiego)_(870).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, cmentarz wojskowy przy ul. Prandoty (część Cmentarza Rakowickiego) --Igor123121 04:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Llez 05:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga 21:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It does appear so, yes.--Peulle 07:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
--Sebring12Hrs 11:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Per others.
Oppose Tilt not corrected. --Gower 19:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga: @Peulle: @Sebring12Hrs: @Gower:
Done Igor123121 16:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Dust spot in the sky, and the sky is a little bit posterized around the dust spot. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 16:33, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs:
Done Igor123121 17:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Orange_Arc_d'Orange_N_20250627.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Triumphal Arch of Orange (north view) --Uoaei1 04:24, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Igor123121 04:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Needs perspective correction: top is larger than bottom --Romainbehar 06:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Done Minor correction done. The verticals of this old building are not all straight! --Uoaei1 12:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok now! Romainbehar 06:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Is it possible to retrieve the burnt highlights ? --Benjism89 16:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Info Yes, as the highlights are not blown, but it makes no improvement on these small and smooth surfaces. --Uoaei1 17:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good like that. Highlights are ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 09:49, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Sebring12Hrs--Lmbuga 20:21, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:26, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:20230520_Crataegus_05.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A Western Honey Bee on a flower of a Hawthorn tree in the nature reserve Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide --FlocciNivis 16:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:05, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Main theme: honey bee isn't fully in focus, neither all the flowers. --Gower 07:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support A little bit soft, but good enough. Lvova 10:43, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Löcherbiene_(Heriades_truncorum)-20250811-RM-180059.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Honey bee (Heriades truncorum) on an anemone flower --Ermell 05:44, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Only bee's head is in focus, blacks clipped. --Gower 07:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Head is not only, but enough. Lvova 10:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Lvova. --Plozessor 03:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Lvova Юрий Д.К. 10:28, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Arco_Conmemorativo,_Plaza_Alonso_de_Ojeda_MG_491720250913.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Memorial Arch, Alonso de Ojeda Square. --Rjcastillo 02:02, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose CA sorry --Cvmontuy 04:09, 15 October 2025 (UTC))
Done new version. --Rjcastillo 22:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Lvova 10:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment red
chromatic aberration not fixed. --Gower 19:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025_Pensjonat_„Chata_Cyborga”_w_Bielicach_(03).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chata Cyborga in Bielice 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
chromatic aberration to fix, color aberrations (red branches in front of black parts of building) --Gower 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Gower:
Done--Jacek Halicki 12:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Gower:
--Gower 12:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality.
Oppose Blue tint on trees not solved. --Gower 04:17, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok for me. "Blue tint" is smoke --Uoaei1 05:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok now, blue tinit is really low. --Sebring12Hrs 17:32, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025_Pensjonat_„Chata_Cyborga”_w_Bielicach_(04).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chata Cyborga in Bielice 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
chromatic aberration to fix, color aberrations on trees (color noise?) --Gower 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Decline per Jacek Halicki personal wish. He wrote to me that he doesn't sees
chromatic aberration and wants discussion. --Gower 07:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree --Jacek Halicki 07:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok for me, no CA visible --Uoaei1 05:28, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment I added a note for the red tint. --Sebring12Hrs 17:33, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs:
Done--Jacek Halicki 06:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs:
Support Ok now. Blue tint is almost no visible, even at full size. --Sebring12Hrs 10:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025_Pensjonat_„Chata_Cyborga”_w_Bielicach_(02).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chata Cyborga in Bielice 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
chromatic aberration to fix, color aberrations on trees (color noise?) --Gower 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Decline per Jacek Halicki personal wish. He wrote to me that he doesn't sees
chromatic aberration and wants discussion. --Gower 07:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree --Jacek Halicki 07:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok for me, no CA visible --Uoaei1 05:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Uoaei1. Lvova 10:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025_Albrechtshalle_w_Lądku-Zdroju_(1).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Albrechtshalle in Lądek-Zdrój by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion *
chromatic aberration to fix --Gower 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Decline per Jacek Halicki personal wish. He wrote to me that he doesn't sees
chromatic aberration and wants discussion. --Gower 07:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree --Jacek Halicki 07:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok for me, no CA visible --Uoaei1 05:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok to me too. --Sebring12Hrs 17:35, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025_Kościół_św._Trójcy_w_Jeleniowie_(1).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Blue tinted branches to correction --Gower 13:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Decline per Jacek Halicki personal wish. He wrote to me that he doesn't see
chromatic aberration and wants to discuss. --Gower 08:07, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree --Jacek Halicki 08:20, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok for me, no CA or blue tinted branches visible at full size --Uoaei1 05:40, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Uoaei1. Lvova 10:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025_Kłodzko,_ul._Okrzei_3_(2).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 3 Okrzei Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 16:52, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Tree spoils the view --Cvmontuy 18:59, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Trees are part of the composition. --Sebring12Hrs 19:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Sebring12Hrs --Uoaei1 05:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025_Kłodzko,_ul._Okrzei_3_(3).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 3 Okrzei Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 16:52, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose View is obstructed. Bad composition --Brihaspati 17:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Trees are part of the composition. --Sebring12Hrs 19:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Brihaspati --Cvmontuy 13:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Sebring12Hrs, no view of this building is possible from this side without trees --Uoaei1 05:46, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Sebring12Hrs. Lvova 18:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025_Kłodzko,_ul._Okrzei_3_(5).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 3 Okrzei Street in Kłodzko 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 16:52, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Composition is messy. --Brihaspati 17:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Technically very good quality. Composition problem are minor IMO. Let's discuss. --George Chernilevsky 17:54, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support This place is messy, so I have no issue with the composition --Uoaei1 05:48, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Gower 19:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:CaliforniaQuail.jpg
[edit]- Nomination California quail in Susanville, California --Polinova 15:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Nice bird but it lacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 16:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I disagree. It has enough sharpness and good quality. --Brihaspati 17:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- We have often noms that are somehow borderline, but I have to say that this one is none of them, Brihaspati. We definitely expect more sharpness that what we see here. Poco a poco 17:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a poco --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco --Jakubhal 19:54, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco --Gower 19:49, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Maracaibo_MG_492020250913.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Signs in Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 02:02, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:02, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It is tilted. Could you correct it?? --Cvmontuy 04:05, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Look at the horizon. I think it is not tilted, just on a hill. Potentially a little tilted to make the subject appear more straight. --Polinova (talk) 15:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment The horizon is tilted, and the base of the letters also needs perspective correction.--Cvmontuy 17:41, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Kamienica_Lisia_Jama.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Lisia Jama --Igor123121 16:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unfixed barrel distortion (look at gutters). --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
So go to CR.... --Sebring12Hrs 20:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC) Info Implicit opposing vote added. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
File:BE_SER_Tribute_to_Vanfleteren.png
[edit]- Nomination Picture made in the beglium Quarter of Ougreé, Liège --Grunpfnul 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
--Sebring12Hrs 15:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Too noisy.
- Its a Picture on tri-x - it has to be Noisy… --Grunpfnul 16:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment I don't know what is "tri-x" but this explanation doesn't convince me. --Sebring12Hrs 17:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- It’s a film made by Kodak --Grunpfnul 21:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Aaaaahhhh ! Sorry ! Not easy to judge. But I think you are right. I agree that noise should remain on a chemical processe. Removing the grain, as is sometimes done on certain old Blu-ray films, removes the authenticity of the technique. So I cancel my vote, but I don't know if I could support. --Sebring12Hrs 18:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but from what you say, it could be FP, but QI, hardly: the noise is alarming, the details are poor (I can mark the lack of detail with a note, how could I not, if I can't even imagine the material of the bricks), the intention is exclusively artistic (it doesn't fit in here at all). --Lmbuga 22:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose
Comment Guys, this isn't noise, it's film grain. The Kodak Tri-X is (was?) a high-sensitivity B&W film with big metallic silver halide particles that produce this gritty texture. I don't know if this image deserves the QI stamp (e.g., the focus doesn't seem to be on the wall), but I don't think it should be rejected on the basis of having film grain. --Julesvernex2 10:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2: I acknowledge the noise due to my lack of knowledge. I note that the ‘noise’ does not affect the sharpness. I reject the image because of its intention and for what it is. It may be that I am very confused.--Lmbuga 11:23, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- I share that confusion. It's not easy to apply the QI guidelines to film images, which do not benefit from noise reduction, sharpening, lens corrections, perspective correction, and a myriad of other comforts of digital photography. Whatever the outcome though, thank you to the nominator for this very interesting image. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, at this moment, I do not feel qualified to comment on this photograph. I believe it would be unfair for me to give my opinion. I no longer have an opinion, but if I did, it would not be negative. --Lmbuga 15:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- But my opinion would never be positive. I still believe it's not IQ.--Lmbuga 23:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Support This is excellent photo even if the formal requirements of the digital age preclude it from being considered "quality." Although, in my opinion, "quality" of a photo implies the ability to make a high-quality large-format print from it. The size and quality of this scan, I believe, would allow for a print up to 30x40 cm without any visible defects. Film grain, by the way, can be an additional artistic touch, enhancing the impression of the print, and the grain of this Tri-X film looks nice. I vote for this "warm analog" photo as "quality," and I would gladly vote for it in the "Image of the Day" nominations. Vsatinet (talk) 14:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not assessable. This is not the place that the picture deserves. --Lmbuga 23:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose This is very interesting picture, but not a QI Jakubhal 04:16, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support This is an excellent reproduction of a sharp and well exposed photograph on a medium that can now be considered historical. --Smial 10:42, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment poor categorization --Gower 11:58, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed, added a few --Julesvernex2 15:14, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Le_Quesnoy,_vue_de_la_rue_du_Maréchal_Joffre_IA59005682.jpg
[edit]- Nomination rue du Maréchal Joffre, Le Quesnoy --Pierre André Leclercq 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Lack of detail. Sorry, It's not QI imo. See the area with the bricks on the right-hand side of the photo, where the street signs are located. --Lmbuga 22:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Lmbuga. --Gower 19:46, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Gliwice_Las_Dabrowa_forest.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Gliwice, Las Dąbrowa nature reserve. --Gower 07:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice view, but nothing is in focus here. --Екатерина Борисова 22:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Екатерина Борисова. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 17:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Katowice_Mickiewicza_5_north.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Katowice, 5 Mickiewicza Street, former baths --Gower 07:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
--Ermell 08:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Noise should be reduced
Comment, thanks @Ermell: for your review, I've uploaded new version from RAW with less noise, could you check it, please? --Gower 15:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support A bit soft now but o.k.--Ermell 13:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Orange_Fungus_Eucalyptus_Ooty_Oct25_A7CR_07947.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Orange fungus on the north side of a eucalyptus tree, Forest Gate, Ooty, India --Tagooty 03:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Lack of sufficient ID. By the way, this might well be a lichen. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose
Done @Robert Flogaus-Faust: Thanks for the hint. Changed the description and CAT to orange lichen. --Tagooty 09:00, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Neutral I am still not happy about the lack of identification, but identification of lichens might be a difficult job that can be done only by a few experts and it might require chemical reagents and microscopy. So I cancel my opposing vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp to me. Very strange textures. --Sebring12Hrs 22:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. Lack sharpness. --Gower 19:45, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:DSC00752_San_Salvator_Laur.jpg
[edit]- Nomination San Salvatore in Lauro --Rione Colonna 09:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Please make the image little bit sharp. Increase the highlight. --Brihaspati 10:20, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Done. Thank you--Rione Colonna 11:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)--Sebring12Hrs 12:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Color noise in the sky.
done.thank you --Rione Colonna 07:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC) --Sebring12Hrs 22:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Comment Color noise is still there to me.
- I don't see it. --Rione Colonna 22:12, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
--Sebring12Hrs 11:00, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose Sorry no color noise (maybe simple noise or lack of sharpness), but very overprocessed now, the textures are washed, not details appear now.
Oppose main entrance is totally blurry, stone textures are horrible partially. --Gower 19:43, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Sebring12Hrs, Gower Check it out now, completely reworked. Thank you --Rione Colonna 18:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes it's very good now ! Thanks. --Sebring12Hrs 11:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Moscow._Church_of_the_Theotokos_of_the_Sign_P4162263_2750.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Moscow. Church of the Theotokos of the Sign --Alexxx1979 07:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Some verticals are done, some are not, the result is unnaturally disctorted, the building is falling down. --Lvova 09:42, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Support The church is not vertikal. Compare with the new building in background. --Mike1979 Russia 08:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Lvova: The building seems to be falling backwards.--Lmbuga 00:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Support PC is good to me. --Sebring12Hrs 09:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025._Kraków,_Teatr_im._Juliusza_Słowackiego,_Plac_Świętego_Ducha_(26).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025. Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego, Plac Świętego Ducha --Igor123121 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Nice try, but not sharp, and the crop is too tight. --Екатерина Борисова 21:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
--Sebring12Hrs 09:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Support Not so bad to me. The crop is acceptable and sharpness good.
Oppose Downscaled --Lmbuga (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Ohh yes, you are right, we can't accept this all the time. --Sebring12Hrs 17:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga: @Sebring12Hrs:
Done Igor123121 16:10, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_Kraków,_Park_Strzelecki_w_Krakowie,_17.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
The previous version had 5,535 × 3,138 pixels--Lmbuga 14:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:02, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Downscaled. --Sebring12Hrs 15:46, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs:Done --Igor123121 16:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment When promoting the pictures, I should have mentioned that a new and correct version had been uploaded for all the pictures. I verified this when I promoted them.--Lmbuga 18:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_Kraków,_Park_Strzelecki_w_Krakowie,_12.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
The metadata says 3,376 x 6,000 px and the picture is 2,100 × 3,732 pixels. The previous version had 3,376 × 6,000. --Lmbuga 14:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose PC is needed. Could you improve the perspective without downscale the image ? --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs:Done --Igor123121 16:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment When promoting the pictures, I should have mentioned that a new and correct version had been uploaded for all the pictures. I verified this when I promoted them. --Lmbuga (talk) 08:26, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose unfixed
chromatic aberration (trees), monument is not in a parallel plane to the camera. --Gower 19:40, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025,_Kraków,_Park_Strzelecki_w_Krakowie,_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
The previous version had 3,376 x 6000 pixels. --Lmbuga 14:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Dust spots. --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs:Done --Igor123121 16:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment When promoting the pictures, I should have mentioned that a new and correct version had been uploaded for all the pictures. I verified this when I promoted them. --Lmbuga (talk) 08:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Volkswagen_Golf_IV_Cabriolet_IMG_3972_(cropped).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Volkswagen Golf IV Cabriolet in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Image quality isn't impressive, lack of detail in dark spots (clipped) --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Not impressive, but Ok IMHO --Velvet 09:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Info Implicit supporting vote clarified. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Support QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 05:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Looks a little noisy in places and not very sharp in places you can tell like tires.
File:Demi_Vollering_-_2025_European_road_championship_podium_-_Guilherand-Granges.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Demi Vollering vainqueure de la course en ligne des championnats d'Europe 2025 à Guilherand-Granges.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :La réalisation de ce document a été parrainée par Wikimédia France. (Proposez un projet !). By User:Kakoula10 --Shougissime 18:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
- Nice, but not very sharp face. --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Hm... the focus is apparently on the tasty gold medal. Nonetheless, I still think that this is good enough for QI. --AFBorchert 20:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- But a bit noisy and for a portrait it's bad that the focus is not on eyes. It is NOT an oppose voice, but I would like to read more opinions. --Lvova 09:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too noisy in subject's face to be QI in my opinion. --E bailey 15:31, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose as E bailey --Gower 20:19, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Over the bar for me. --Plozessor 06:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Plozessor --Ermell 13:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The face is too blurry IMO, especially considering the rather small image size. Was this photo downscaled? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:55, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per other. --Sebring12Hrs 22:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice photo, but the face is too blurry, digital processing artefacts are visible on the face and neck. Sorry. LexKurochkin 07:27, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Avestruz_(Struthio_camelus),_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_33.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Subject not in focus. --E bailey 14:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Ostrich not very sharp. --Gower 17:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry guys, this reviews are not fine. It's a wild shot taken with a 600mm lens, I still applied more sharpness, QI to me if I know what this is about --Poco a poco 22:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- But the fact about hardness of photoshooting is unrelated to sharpness, in my opinion you also often nominate pictures that are unsharp - I stopped to comment because of your reaction. This photo has problems with the colors of the neck now. Lvova 08:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- True, there was some color noise, I removed it Poco a poco 17:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support now. Lvova 18:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- True, there was some color noise, I removed it Poco a poco 17:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I’ll add this right away. These pages often mention that there are conditions in which QI cannot be achieved - for example, specific museum conditions or photos of buildings on very narrow streets. This is just a given, which doesn’t mean the photos are bad or useless; they simply don’t fit the QI criteria. But for some reason, you think that outside the rules, we should make an exception for wildlife shots taken with a telephoto lens; traditionally, this often works, especially since you can reference the fact that many of your images have been accepted under this approach.
- Additionally, you refer to the equipment of the people evaluating your work. Indeed, my camera has far more technical limitations than yours; there are situations where it’s pointless for me to shoot even for illustrative purposes, without aiming for QI. However, I’m getting better at understanding these conditions and limitations and achieving results without trying to say, "Come on, look at how tough the conditions were for a phone camera". Your equipment has fewer limitations, but there are still some. Don’t rely on authority instead of simply accepting its limitations. Lvova 09:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- I don't understand what you try to elaborate, sorry. There are always limitations, but nobody can expect the same sharpness (which isn't impossible but unlikely) of a manhole vs shy wild life for which you need a strong tele, specially when reviewers pixelpee 50 Mpx images. Poco a poco 17:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I try to say that I don't like ideas like '48mp cannot be not ideal'. It still can be sharp enough or not. You're good at processing, not only in photoshooting, so after 2 fixes it is QI, but I dislike what you regularly say when see an oppose voice (like here). Lvova 18:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I don't understand what you try to elaborate, sorry. There are always limitations, but nobody can expect the same sharpness (which isn't impossible but unlikely) of a manhole vs shy wild life for which you need a strong tele, specially when reviewers pixelpee 50 Mpx images. Poco a poco 17:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- But the fact about hardness of photoshooting is unrelated to sharpness, in my opinion you also often nominate pictures that are unsharp - I stopped to comment because of your reaction. This photo has problems with the colors of the neck now. Lvova 08:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry guys, this reviews are not fine. It's a wild shot taken with a 600mm lens, I still applied more sharpness, QI to me if I know what this is about --Poco a poco 22:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't see any problem with sharpness here. It the eye is out of focus, then it's by no more than a few centimeters ... --Benjism89 16:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Question Why are the neck and right part of the back so hazy, compared to the rest? --Plozessor 06:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not sufficiently sharp for a bird at rest. --Tagooty 06:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Soccer_goal_at_the_beach_boulevard_of_Toroni.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Soccer goal at the beach boulevard of Toroni --Kritzolina 17:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 08:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 09:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Ermell.--Peulle 08:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support IMO ok. --Sebring12Hrs 10:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 07:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Ermell. --LexKurochkin 07:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Chatham_Cenotaph,_Chatham,_Ontario,_2025-07-06_03.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chatham Cenotaph, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 14:18, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Comment Nice photo, but I see what looks like a speck of dust near the sculpture's right elbow. --Vsatinet 14:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality, no doubt. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Until an answer to the question about that dot. --Lvova 09:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Oppose
Support Good definition. Good representation of the monument. --Harlock81 10:12, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Harlock81, yes, it could be, for example, a small fly crossing the frame out of DoF. But IMHO it looks like garbage and ruins the shot just as a dust spot. And it's easy to remove it. Vsatinet 07:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Harlock81. --Gower 19:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 8 after nomination)
[edit]- Sat 11 Oct → Sun 19 Oct
- Sun 12 Oct → Mon 20 Oct
- Mon 13 Oct → Tue 21 Oct
- Tue 14 Oct → Wed 22 Oct
- Wed 15 Oct → Thu 23 Oct
- Thu 16 Oct → Fri 24 Oct
- Fri 17 Oct → Sat 25 Oct
- Sat 18 Oct → Sun 26 Oct
- Sun 19 Oct → Mon 27 Oct