Commons:Segnalazioni per la vetrina

Segnalazioni per la vetrina in altre lingue:

Shortcut: [[:]]

Passa alla lista di candidati per la vetrina

Passa alla lista di candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina

Queste immagini sono candidate per la vetrina. Fare attenzione a non confondere questa pagina con le immagini del giorno.

Guida

Candidare un immagine

Linee guida per candidare un'immagine

È importante leggere le linee guida prima di candidare un'immagine.

A seguito è riportato un riassunto dei punti essenziali per candidare e valutare le immagini candidate:

Risoluzione - Le fotografie con una risoluzione inferiore a 2 milioni di pixel vengono generalmente rifiutate e rimosse ad eccezione di motivi contrari di particolare importanza. Si noti che le immagini con risoluzione 1600 x 1200 hanno 1.92 Mpx, appena inferiore al limite minimo di 2Mpx.

Ricordiamo che le immagini caricate su Commons vengono visualizzate non solo su schermi tradizionali di PC ma sono utilizzate anche per stampa e visualizzazione su schermi ad alta risoluzione. Non possiamo certo prevedere quali tecnologie verranno utilizzate nel futuro quindi è importante che le immagini scelte per la vetrina abbiano una risoluzione quanto più alta è possibile.

Scansioni - È consigliabile seguire la guida alla scansione, che propone suggerimenti per l'ottenimento di immagini ottimali

Fuoco - ovviamente ogni oggetto significativo dell'immagine deve essere ben definito e a fuoco.

Primo piano e sfondo - Oggetti in primissimo piano o di sfondo possono distrarre dalla vista dal oggetto principale dell'immagine. È il caso di controllare se qualche elemento in primo piano non copra nessun elemento importante e che lo sfondo non distolga l'attenzione e renda confusa l'immagine (per esempio evitare che vi sia una luce forte alle spalle di un viso)

Qualità generale - le immagini candidate devono essere di alta qualità tecnica.

Le manipolazioni digitali non devono essere effettuate per ingannare, ma vanno usate solo limitatamente e con cura per correggere difetti fotografici. Le manipolazioni comunemente accettate sono il ritaglio e la correzione di prospettiva, focale, colore ed esposizione. Manipolazioni più estese, come può essere la rimozione di un elemento di distrazione dello sfondo, vanno chiaramente descritte nel testo di descrizione per mezzo del template {{Retouched picture}}. Manipolazioni non descritte o descritte in modo insufficiente non permettono la candidatura alla vetrina.

Valore - il nostro principale obiettivo è eleggere le immagini con il maggior valore rispetto a tutte le loro simili. Le immagini devono essere in qualche modo speciali, perciò fai attenzione:
- quasi tutti i tramonti sono esteticamente piacevoli, infatti molte immagini sono simili alle altre,
- gli scatti notturni sono gradevoli ma generalmente le foto scattate di giorno mostrano molti più dettagli,
- non tutte le belle foto hanno in realtà un valore che non sia esclusivamente personale.

Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto tecnico abbiamo come parametri l'esposizione, la composizione, il controllo del movimento e la profondità di campo.

L'esposizione si riferisce alla combinazione tra tempo di esposizione e diaframma. Questa combinazione permette generalmente di avere una curva di tono che è in grado di rappresentare ombre e luci con un dettaglio accettabile. Questa curva viene detta latitudine di posa. Un'immagine può essere nella banda bassa, media o alta. Le fotocamere digitali (e le loro foto) hanno una latitudine di posa più stretta delle macchine a pellicola. La mancanza di dettagli nelle zone d'ombra non è necessariamente una caratteristica negativa. Infatti questa può essere parte dell'effetto desiderato, mentre ampie zone eccessivamente sovraesposte possono distrarre la vista.

La composizione si riferisce alla distribuzione degli elementi nell'immagine. La “Regola dei Terzi” è una buona linea guida per la composizione e eredita molto dagli studi di disegno. Il concetto principale considera l'immagine divisa con due linee orizzontali e due verticali, che dividono l'immagine in tre parti. Generalmente se l'oggetto viene centrato si ha un effetto poco interessante, mentre se l'oggetto viene posizionato in uno dei punti di interesse, ovvero l'intersezione delle quattro linee, si ottiene un effetto decisamente migliore. Le linee dell'orizzonte infatti non dovrebbero essere posizionate nel centro, perché taglierebbero la foto a metà; è invece preferibile scegliere una delle linee orizzontali. Complessivamente bisogna tendere a creare un'immagine dinamica.

Il controllo del movimento si riferisce al modo viene rappresentato il movimento nell'immagine. Il movimento può essere bloccato (seguito dalla fotocamera) oppure può essere lasciato scorrere, tuttavia l'oggetto principale dell'immagine deve essere visibile. Nessuna delle due tecniche è migliore dell'altra, la buona riuscita dipende esclusivamente dal tipo di effetto ricercato. Per esempio, fotografando una vettura da corsa che appare statica in relazione allo sfondo, che invece scorre sul retro, si ottiene l'oggetto principale in una condizione statica mentre lo sfondo crea il senso di movimento. (questa tecnica è chiamata "panning"). D'altra parte, fotografando un giocatore di basket in salto, bloccato in relazione a tutto il resto dello sfondo, si otterrebbe un buono scatto proprio per la posa innaturale.

La profondità di campo (PdC o DOF dall'inglese depth of field) è la distanza davanti e dietro il soggetto principale che appare nitida (a fuoco). Questo parametro viene scelto a seconda delle necessità di ogni immagine e può parimenti migliorare o peggiorare la qualità di una fotografia. Generalmente viene utilizzata una PdC ridotta per mettere al centro dell'attenzione il soggetto principale, separandolo da tutto il resto dello sfondo. Invece viene utilizzata una grande PdC per enfatizzare la profondità di un immagine. Gli obiettivi grandangolari in genere una grande PdC mentre i teleobiettivi ne hanno una decisamente ridotta. In gran parte la PdC dipende dall'apertura del diaframma: aumenta con il diminuire dell'apertura e viceversa.

Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto grafico prendiamo invece in considerazione nitidezza, profondità, colore, superficie, prospettiva, bilanciamento, proporzione, ecc.

La nitidezza si riferisce alle linee di contorno del soggetto principale.

La profondità si riferisce alla qualità dell'aspetto tridimensionale del soggetto. Ciò si ottiene soprattutto tramite un'adeguata illuminazione laterale (come quella della prima mattinata o del tardo pomeriggio) e non esclusivamente frontale, al fine di evitare l'appiattimento del soggetto.

Il colore è un elemento molto importante e non deve essere né troppo né poco saturo.

La superficie si riferisce alla qualità della superficie degli oggetti fotografati.

La prospettiva si riferisce all'angolazione dalla quale è stata scattata la fotografia. Essa crea una serie di rette immaginarie che seguono gli spigoli paralleli degli oggetti e si incontrano in un punto che può essere dentro o fuori l'immagine.

Il bilanciamento si riferisce alla disposizione degli oggetti nell'immagine e può essere equilibrato o porre maggior peso verso una direzione.

La proporzione si riferisce alla relazione tra le dimensioni degli oggetti all'interno dell'immagine. Generalmente si tende a rappresentare oggetti con ridotta relazione, ma una buona tecnica è quella di rappresentare gli oggetti di dimensioni minori in modo più esteso, contrariamente a quanto è in realtà. Per esempio, un piccolo fiore che viene rappresentato con le stesse dimensioni di una grande montagna: questa tecnica viene chiamata inversione di scala.

Ovviamente, non tutte le caratteristiche devono essere necessariamente presenti. Le immagini possono essere giudicate sia per una sola caratteristica che per diverse caratteristiche, anche contemporaneamente.

Significato simbolico o rilevanza particolare …Le guerre d'opinione possono iniziare!…. Va ricordato che una pessima fotografia di un soggetto difficilissimo da fotografare è sicuramente migliore di un'immagine ordinaria e tradizionale (come un comune tramonto).

Le immagini possono essere scelte da un fotografo o da un osservatore anche per motivi culturali, tenendo però sempre conto del contesto dello scatto e non di quello dell'osservatore. Un'immagine inoltre può "parlare" alle persone e avere la capacità di evocare emozioni, che tuttavia non devono essere necessariamente piacevoli.

Per ottimizzare le possibilità di successo delle candidature delle tue immagini è consigliabile leggere le linee guida complete.

Come candidare un'immagine

Se credi di aver trovato o creato un immagine che può essere presa in considerazione per la vetrina, che abbia una appropriata descrizione e una licenza adeguata, allora segui queste indicazioni.

Punto 1: copia il nome dell'immagine dentro la casella di testo (includendo anche il prefisso Image: ) a seguito del testo già presente nella casella (per esempio Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG.) ed infine clicca il pulsante candida una nuova immagine.

Punto 2: segui le istruzioni della pagina alla quale vieni collegato e salva le modifiche apportate.

Punto 3: inserisci manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata in cima alla lista candidati: Clicca qui e aggiungi il testo che segue all'inizio della lista di candidature:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG}}

Votare

Per votare puoi usare i seguenti templates:

{{A favore}} ( Support) per supportare la candidatura,
{{Contrario}} ( Oppose) per opporsi alla candidatura,
{{Neutrale}} ( Neutral) per esprimere un parere neutrale,
{{Commento}} ( Comment) per esprimere solo un commento,
{{Info}} ( Info) per aggiungere delle informazioni riguardanti l'immagine,
{{Domanda}} ( Question) per chiedere informazioni.

Puoi inoltre evidenziare che l'immagine non ha possibilità di essere eletta con il template {{FPX|motivo}}, inserendo al posto di motivo le ragioni per cui è chiaramente inaccettabile per la vetrina.

Ogni votante è pregato di motivare il proprio voto con qualche parola, in particolar modo se si vota contro. Ricorda inoltre di aggiungere la tua firma (~~~~). I voti anonimi non sono accettati.

Candidare un'immagine alla rimozione dalla vetrina

Gli standard della vetrina cambiano col tempo. Può succedere che un'immagine che era stata eletta per la vetrina non sia più adatta agli standard attuali.

Questa lista è perciò composta dalle immagini considerate non più adatte a rimanere nella vetrina. Vota:

{{Mantenere}} Keep per far sì che l'immagine rimanga nella vetrina.
{{Rimuovere}} Oppose per far sì che l'immagine venga rimossa dalla vetrina.

Se consideri che un'immagine non rispetti più i criteri delle immagini in vetrina, candidala per la rimozione copiando il nome dell'immagine dentro questa casella di testo (includendo il prefisso dell' Image:) a seguito del testo già presente in essa:

Nella pagina appena creata includi:

Le informazioni sull'origine dell'immagine (autore dell'immagine, autore della candidatura);
Un collegamento all'iniziale candidatura per l'inserimento nella vetrina (che va inserito sotto ==Collegamenti== nella descrizione dell'immagine);
Il motivo per cui l'hai candidata per la rimozione dalla vetrina e il tuo Nome utente.

Dopo aver fatto ciò devi inserire manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata all'inizio della lista di rimozione dalla vetrina.

Politica di elezione per la vetrina

Regole generali

Il periodo di votazione è di 9 giorni completi, a partire dalla candidatura. I risultato verrà determinato alla fine di questo periodo. I voti aggiunti il decimo giorno o a seguito non verranno considerati.
Sono benvenuti i contributori anonimi.
I contributi di anonimi alle discussioni sono benvenuti.
I voti di contributori anonimi non saranno accettati.
La candidatura non conta come voto. Il voto di supporto va esplicitato.
Gli autori delle candidature possono ritirare le loro immagini candidate in ogni momento. Questo si ottiene scrivendo semplicemente "I withdraw my nomination" (in inglese: ritiro la mia candidatura)
o aggiungendo il testo {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
Ricorda che l'obiettivo del progetto Wikimedia Commons è di costruire una raccolta di immagini utilizzabili da tutti i progetti Wikimedia, inclusi possibili progetti futuri. Perciò non bisogna pensare che questo sia una raccolta dedicata esclusivamente al progetto Wikipedia e per tanto le immagini non vanno valutate in funzione di ciò.
Le immagini vengono rimosse dalla lista di candidature se non hanno voti a supporto (escluso quello dell'autore della candidatura) entro il quinto giorno dalla candidatura (La regola del quinto giorno)
Le immagini dotate del template {{FPX}} non devono essere rimosse dalla lista entro le 48 ore successive al momento in cui è stato applicato il template, purchè non vi sia nessun voto a supporto oltre quello dell'autore della candidatura.

Regole di ammissione e rimozione dalla vetrina

Un'immagine candidata viene ammessa alla vetrina se si verificano le seguenti condizioni:

La licenza è adeguata (ovviamente).
Se ha almeno 5 voti a supporto.
Se il rapporto tra voti pro/contro è almeno 2/1 (se ha due terzi di maggioranza).
Non possono essere ammessi alla vetrina diverse versioni della stessa immagine, ne deve essere scelta una sola versione.

I criteri per la rimozione dalla vetrina sono gli stessi per l'ammissione ad essa, compreso il periodo di voto e la regola del quinto giorno (vedi nelle Regole generali).

Ogni utente esperto può portare a termine una votazione: per istruzioni su come compiere questa operazione vedi la guida per portare a termina la votazione.

Infine, sii cortese

Per piacere non dimenticare che l'immagine che stai giudicando è frutto del lavoro di qualcuno. Evita di usare frasi come è orribile: se devi opporti non fare spiacevoli considerazioni. Inoltre ricorda che è necessario scrivere in inglese se vuoi essere compreso dagli altri utenti e che il tuo utilizzo di questa lingua e quello degli altri utenti può comunque generare incomprensioni se non si ha un'ottima conoscenza, perciò scegli le parole con cura.

Buon voto… e ricorda che.... tutte le regole possono avere qualche eccezione.

Vedi anche

Per modificare la lista di candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
Per una lista cronologica delle candidature: Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
Per un archivio delle precedenti candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
Per istruzioni su come portare a termine una procedura di voto: Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
Lista di termini base del linguaggio fotografico
Candidature per le immagini di qualità
Critica fotografica
Guida alla scansione

Indice

Candidati per la vetrina

Aggiorna la pagina: purge this page's cache

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Sulzenauferner 2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 11:35:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
Info The glacier Sulzenauferner in the Stubai Alps and surrounding mountains. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but there are at least 2 dust spots in the sky (in the middle) Poco a poco (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the hint. I cleaned the sky. Feel free to leave a note, if there are spots left. Milseburg (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diesel locomotive and what seems like an endless line of hopper cars on tracks in Lamar, Colorado LCCN2015632680.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 10:41:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#United States
Info created by Carol M. Highsmith, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 10:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great perspective and combo but when you look at it in full res you get disappointed. The res is big, but still Poco a poco (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, it's too unsharp in full resolution and even while regarding a smaller version. --Milseburg (talk) 12:36, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:NASA Apollo 17 Lunar Roving Vehicle.jpg (delist and replace)

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 10:18:50

Info To be replaced by a higher resolution version (Original nomination)
Info It should be placed in Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space exploration ground vehicles
Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 10:18, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rusty-flanked Treecreeper in Senchal Wildlife Sanctuary May 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 10.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 06:43:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Certhiidae_(Treecreepers)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:43, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:43, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot. Wolverine X-eye 10:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I disagree, not a big bird (12-13 cm) but I would still expect more detail Poco a poco (talk) 11:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pseudoleon superbus Coacalco 20251018p1.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 05:00:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 05:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 05:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pearl Mist.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 16:22:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info Older image (2011), but excellent composition, and technical quality is still very good for the age. The image shows the Pearl Mist, a cruise ship launched in 2014, at the Shelburne Shipyard in Nova Scotia, Canada, during a period when the completed ship was docked pending a legal dispute. Created by Dennis G. Jarvis – uploaded by X-Weinzar – nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not bad. Wolverine X-eye 16:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:SulWitaCollage.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 13:56:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A collage image of an individual bald eagle aging through different plumages from nestling to adult

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Sequences (Chronological)
Info created by Polinova, William Thein, and Ingela Kaersvang – uploaded by Polinova – nominated by Polinova -- Polinova (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Polinova (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A series of full-sized images as a set would be better, but we don't have that, and this collage is good and educational. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:04, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting to observe Poco a poco (talk) 11:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Земјен пат на Козјак.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 09:49:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not that interesting a scene, and color noise in the clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vihren & Kutelo Pirin Mountains Bulgaria 2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 05:32:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Bulgaria
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The last sunrays of the day illuminating the majestic peaks of Vihren and Kutelo in the Pirin Mountains of Bulgaria —kallerna (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but there are a few striations toward the upper left corner in the sky. What are those? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see any special striations. Maybe you can provide a note on the img? —kallerna (talk) 08:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I added a note. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I think those are natural, but they can be edited out also if you think they are a problem. —kallerna (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support If you think they're natural, that's good enough for me. I just wanted to know what they were. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm not seeing anything either. Good image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloeiwijze van een Rostrinucula dependens. 11-10-2025. (d.j.b).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 04:41:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Lamiaceae
Info Inflorescence of a Rostrinucula dependens. This subshrub is native to China and blooms from August to October. Focus stack of 54 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 05:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! Bokeh background is green plants? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support. The background is pure nature, namely our lawn (grass).--Famberhorst (talk) 09:08, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Terragio67 (talk) 09:44, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vibrant! Wolverine X-eye 16:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eravikulam National Park-WUS07189.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 03:18:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#India
Info created and uploaded by Rainer Halama – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine shot. Wolverine X-eye 16:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:52, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you have used somewhat too much noise reduction? I see borders on some of the hills and trees in the distance, and the terraces in the middleground and hills a bit further back also seem a bit distorted. I'd love for you to try moving the slider back a little on the noise reduction, if you indeed used it, so we can see whether it makes this landscape look more normal. I don't know if anyone else will see things the way I do, of course. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't edit it, and I actually think it wasn't edited, but @Rainer Halama: can give us a definitive answer. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bengal tiger in Sanjay Dubri Tiger Reserve December 2024 by Tisha Mukherjee 11.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 02:57:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species_:_Panthera_tigris_(Tigers)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 02:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 02:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support great expression on the tiger. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:20, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one! Beautiful tiger, well captured. (To me, its expression is very cat-like.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little noisy but fantastic shot! --Polinova (talk) 14:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:55, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Healthy looking cat! Wolverine X-eye 16:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imperial Sand Dunes2C Southeastern California LCCN2013630449.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2025 at 20:22:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#California
Info created by Carol Highsmith – uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 20:22, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great shot by Highsmith. -- JayCubby (talk) 20:22, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 22:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful movements formed by nature.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Famberhorst. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love Highsmith's work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a high quality image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolverine X-eye (talk • contribs) 16:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 05:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:017 Hyacinth macaw flying in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2025 at 06:26:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_Parrots)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Umarxon III (talk) 07:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 07:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would put Light on Blue a bit down, but much more on Green and some Highligths down. --Mile (talk) 08:06, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing capture! Wolverine X-eye 16:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 18:22, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Impressive! JayCubby (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 05:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norderney, Tonnenleger "Norden" -- 2025 -- 9137.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2025 at 06:11:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 06:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I've always wondered how the big buoys are placed. (sometimes, I wish there were fewer of them, because it's not fun to dodge buoys when sailing.) JayCubby (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful moment.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:38, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:King Christian X in Copenhagen 1940.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2025 at 01:17:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1900s#1940-1949 – uploaded by Doug Wilson~commonswiki – nominated by Chorchapu -- Chorchapu (talk) 01:17, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is my first ever Featured Picture nomination so apologies if I'm doing anything wrong. I was looking through the Wikipedia article for w:King Christian X and saw a colorised version of this photograph. It's admittedly lacking in quality but I think it makes up for it with the historical significance. -- Chorchapu (talk) 01:17, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, it could be a FP, but not with this quality. Sadly, I couldn't find a higher resolution version with Google Images or Tineye. Yann (talk) 13:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. Might be a VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. --Milseburg (talk) 11:39, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stained Glass Coat of Arms dated 1764, Castello Sforzesco, Milan.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 21:44:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info created by Julian Lupyan – uploaded by Julian Lupyan – nominated by Julian Lupyan -- Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hello everybody, this is my first nomination. I'd like to say I'm aware that there is a bit of a lack of detail (the lighting situation was a little strange), but I really liked the composition and would appreciate all comments and advice. -- Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome to FPC, Julian - a wonderful start! A thoughtful and refreshing first nomination. The composition works well - the stained glass and the blurred glimpse of the building beyond create an intriguing depth. Well seen, and thank you for this wonderful idea. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:14, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the kind welcome! Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:21, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~That white etiquette doesnt help. I would color it black.~~ --Mile (talk) 08:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Improvement proposed Good point, Mile. @Julian, I took the liberty of removing the label and, while I was at it, I made some slight adjustments to the contrast and tone values. This is just a suggestion and is available via the SwissTransfer link. If you like it, feel free to use the edit for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:35, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Done @Mile @User:Radomianin Changes adopted, I think this is a great edit. Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I like this photo in this edit and I'm considering supporting the nomination. Could you add information about the dimensions of the stained glass to your file description? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, please add information about the artwork. --Yann (talk) 07:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support New to me. --Mile (talk) 07:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinking building in Montmartre.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 15:38:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others
Info created by Tangopaso – uploaded by Tangopaso – nominated by Tangopaso -- Tangopaso (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tangopaso (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A creative take on photographing a normal building, but since this is more of a trick photo than a proper representation of an actual event, the gallery should also reflect this. Funny and fanciful image names are ok for Flickr or Instagram, but the policy is that Commons images should be properly named and categorized. There are plenty of building really unstable in some way, so it should be clear to the viewer what's going on here. We don't need to spread more misinformation in the world, there is plenty of that already. --Cart (talk) 16:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I dont understand your comment. Its obvious that it is an actual building, you have even the location of the building in Paris. It is not an unstable building. It is only a joke.

If you want in Commons only photos of actual objects, you must forbid all the art, paintings, drawings, sculptures. Does Wikipédia understand humor?--Tangopaso (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course we can have jokes, humor and such things here, but the description, file names and galleries should be correct since that is how people find images here. If you call this a 'sinking building', it will come up in searches people make for actual sinking buildings. If you indicate in the title and description that it's a funny joke photo, then people who are looking for funny photos will find it. With the right words, your photo will find the right audience. --Cart (talk) 21:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question The resolution (6 MPx) is low, don't you have more pixels to offer? Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~No sorry, I dont have --Tangopaso (talk) 08:20, 17 October 2025 (UTC)~~[reply]

I uploaded an image with better definitionː 3.38 Mb instead of 2.18 Mb. I hope it will be OK. --Tangopaso (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 20:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logan Square; Spring Garden.png

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 14:47:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#United States
Info created by Szeremeta – uploaded by Szeremeta – nominated by Szeremeta -- Szeremeta (talk) 14:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Szeremeta (talk) 14:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 15:53, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not even QI to me, lack of detail, noisy lack of perspective correction and random compo. Definitely no FP Poco a poco (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't think perspective correction was demanded from drone photos. I do agree that we've seen much sharper and less noisy drone pics, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's a 100 megapixel file. It's not comparable to a 100 megapixel medium-format image, but impressive for a drone shot, one can even read the building names! Comparisons with other drone images should be done at the same resolution / print size, not at 100% --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:43, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're right, so I'll Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:38, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The embedded color profile is Adobe RGB, which often gives wrong results with web browsers. File:Logan Square, Spring Garden.jpg is a JPEG version with sRGB color profile. You can add it as alternative. Yann (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is that still an issue with modern browsers? I thought that the Chrome/Firefox/Safari releases from the last few years had no issues displaying Adobe RGB images, as long as there was an embedded profile. I often use Adobe RGB in images with dark greens to reduce posterisation when converting to an 8-bit JPEG. Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asbury Park Oceanfront Aerial (October 15, 2025).png

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 14:43:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#United States
Info created by Szeremeta – uploaded by Szeremeta – nominated by Szeremeta -- Szeremeta (talk) 14:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Szeremeta (talk) 14:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 15:55, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this one is good. Please remind me of the advantages of JPEGs over PNGs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
PNGs
- take up much more space
- MW's thumbnail generator blurs PNG thumbnails (and nobody's fixed that bug for decadeS if my memory serves me)
JayCubby (talk) 22:58, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know. If these don’t pass I’ll be sure to retry as JPEGs. Szeremeta (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The embedded color profile is Adobe RGB, which often gives wrong results with web browsers. File:Asbury Park Oceanfront Aerial (October 15, 2025).jpg is a JPEG version with sRGB color profile. You can add it as alternative. Yann (talk) 07:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weißes Haus, agra-Park, Markkleeberg, 1708230939, ako.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 11:12:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Saxony
Info No FPs of this place. Harmonious composition. created by Code – uploaded by Code – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The spots in the sky should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 13:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition. Szeremeta (talk) 14:55, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Peaceful, and even more than the building, the weeping willow is the star of the photo. I think you should add a category for it and maybe also for the tree just to the right of the building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 20:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:01, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nybrokajen Blasieholmen Stockholm 2016 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 11:12:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
Info No FPs of this place. I love the light. created by Julian Herzog – uploaded by Julian Herzog – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 12:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Szeremeta (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 15:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:18, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, that light and look is a signature of Julian Herzog, who's one of my favorite photographers on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:01, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castle Pfalzgrafenstein - Kaub - 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 10:37:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info created by imehling -- imehling (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I hope this castle is outstanding enough. -- imehling (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:18, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Szeremeta (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, for me the image doesn't work well enough for FP. The building ist too bright (maybe fixable) and it doesn't stand out enough from the background. --Alexander-93 (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I concur, sorry, not the best POV Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meadow in the Smoky Mountains (41665h).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 02:14:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Tennessee
Info Meadow in the Great Smoky Mountains (in the morning, amid the namesake "smoke"), Tennessee. Debated whether to nominate this one or the one taken a bit later in the day, but the one with the "smoke" seemed more fitting, even if the lighting is unusual for FPC. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:14, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:14, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for nominating this image and not the other one, I learned a lot from it. I often shy away from compositions with a subject in the shadows against a bright background, but here it works beautifully. Like in this or that painting, the viewer is guided first through the shadow, creating context, and then into the light, adding contrast. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Evokes the quiet atmosphere of a Théodore Rousseau landscape - serene, misty, and beautifully balanced. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:34, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 09:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 12:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely stunning. Szeremeta (talk) 14:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Julesvernex2 (thank you for emphasising the instructive ‘dark subject against a bright background’ point!) and Radomianin. Like you, I am reminded of landscape paintings by this composition. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:05, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. The beauty and rhythm of the wildflowers in the foreground shouldn't be ignored as one of the elements that makes this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The smoke in the background adds to the composition. Wolverine X-eye 16:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Love the lighting and composition; very painterly. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-legged grasshopper (72625).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 02:10:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Acrididae_(Short-horned_grasshoppers_and_locusts)
Info Red-legged grasshopper (Melanoplus femurrubrum) munching on a flower, covered in pollen (grasshoppers are pollinators, too!). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Natural, well-balanced sharpness that feels effortless and authentic. The visible pollen detail greatly enhances the picture's encyclopedic value. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support f/8 is safe too. --Mile (talk) 09:22, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, what a harmonious composition and extraordinarily good image quality Cmao20 (talk) 11:16, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:16, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exquisite. Wolverine X-eye 14:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool stuff Poco a poco (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. Very impressive and instructive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 18:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malcolm X 1964 press photo.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 23:19:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1960-1969
Info created by AP News – uploaded by 999real – nominated by Bremps -- Bremps... 23:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- High quality shot of his face, illustrates his defiant attitude, high historical value Bremps... 23:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking portrait with an almost low-key feel: precise shadows, expressive face, and a calm dark background conveying depth and subtle drama. -- Radomianin (talk) 01:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 01:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Its good shot, but i miss some exposure. --Mile (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info We have one previous FP of him. --Cart (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, but this one is much better. --Yann (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It was just a statement/information, nothing more, to have something to compare with and I agree with you. --Cart (talk) 16:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad we have both, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 07:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 08:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--JustEMV (talk) 16:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbanegra rayado (Oxycheilinus digramma), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-24, DD 51.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 20:57:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Labridae (Wrasses)
Info Cheek-lined wrasse (Oxycheilinus digramma), Anilao, Philippines. This species of wrasse is native to the Indian Ocean and the western Pacific Ocean and lives in coral reefs, sheltered inland areas, and lagoons, possibly at depths from 3 to 60 metres (9.8 to 196.9 ft). It can grow to about 40 centimetres (16 in) in standard length, the coloring varies from pale gray to purple, and it eats sea urchins, molluscs, and crustaceans. Note: there are no FPs of the genus Oxycheilinus on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great details at and beyond life size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:48, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:07, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:15, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:28, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calanque de l'Erevine.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 15:06:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#France
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Limestone cliffs, turquoise waters, and the railway viaduct of Calanque de l’Érevine, a picturesque coastal inlet on the Côte Bleue in southern France —kallerna (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful photo of a scene that runs a high vertical gamut. I may have missed it, but you might want to say where you took the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I added the geolocation. —kallerna (talk) 04:09, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Beautiful contrast between turquoise sea and sky, vivid yet natural tones. -- Radomianin (talk) 00:48, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good view, but center is overexposed, white stones. --Mile (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should be quite realistic considering the scene. —kallerna (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:14, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I would have liked to see more on the right. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Something like this? —kallerna (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I would definitely support that picture (and prefer it over the nom), with maybe slightly more crop on left. Beautiful place and picture. Alternatively, you could change this nom to Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges (since the bridge is the hero here, imo) and nominate the other one for Places/Others#France. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Gun to my head, I'd pick the other one, but I think they are different enough for both to be FPs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMO 8408480 - Florian.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 14:35:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 16:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harmonious composition, nice ship. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:28, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - This is a technically good picture of a particular tugboat but doesn't show it in action. QI, VI yes, but IMO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree, too static/centered Poco a poco (talk) 17:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Црква „Св. Троица“ - Добрача 7.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 11:22:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info There are relatively well-preserved decorations on both sides of the aedicule, on the mullion's capital and on the tracery. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment perhaps a bit underexposed? But nice subject and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmao20: I've uploaded a brighter version by 1 EV. How does it look now? --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support now Cmao20 (talk) 13:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Still kind of dull light and not that sharp or striking to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:40, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose That mix of old archicture and modern bricks is of no help, I'm afraid. Poco a poco (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your opinions. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marie Goldsmith (retouched).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 09:35:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1910-1919
Info Photograph taken by Pierre Choumoff – retouched by ReneeWrites – originally uploaded by Grnrchst – nominated by Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator. -- Grnrchst (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. JayCubby (talk) 14:58, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quite small, poor quality. We have thousands of pictures like this on Commons. What is special here? Yann (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:023 Yacare caiman sunbathing in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 09:13:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Alligatoridae_(Alligators_and_Caimans)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexis Lours (talk) 09:17, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 11:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. I can see three FPs of this species in the category, but that's not too many, and this one is probably the best yet Cmao20 (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality + compo. JayCubby (talk) 14:59, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. Wolverine X-eye 17:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 02:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality, compo so-so. Center position of head isnt favourable but probably you want that second croc head too. --Mile (talk) 08:24, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:54, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 13:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:39, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common Swift 2025 07 18 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 08:47:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Order : Apodiformes (Hummingbirds and Swifts)
Info A common swift (Apus apus) in flight, created by Alexis Lours – uploaded by Alexis Lours – nominated by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:49, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - One of the fastest birds in the world makes for a hard capture. Nice. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thanks for giving us that context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Rhododendrites' context. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - --GRDN711 (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)--GRDN711 (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:08, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common tern 2025 07 08 08.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 08:41:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Sterna
Info A common tern (Sterna hirundo) in flight with a fish, created by Alexis Lours – uploaded by Alexis Lours – nominated by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Absolutely superb Cmao20 (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 02:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:30, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:20, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing nectaring position of Aulocera brahminus (Blanchard, 1853) - Narrow-banded Satyr ANK8120.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 07:45:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Aulocera
Info created by Ankit0908 – uploaded by Ankit0908 – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 07:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 07:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. Composition is absolutely beautiful and I was preparing to support but looking at it in full size the quality is poor (pixellated and noisy) Cmao20 (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will try sir Ankit0908 (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have uploaded less noisy image, please check. Ankit0908 (talk) 04:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perhaps the noise has been sharpened? Ankit0908, can this be fixed? JayCubby (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
May be, I Will try to fixed shortly. Ankit0908 (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have uploaded less noisy image, please check. Ankit0908 (talk) 04:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Improved. I'm no longer sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Light trails in Centro de Gramado at night (25415341663).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 04:23:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Light trails
Info created by Felipe Valduga – 1st uploaded by Sintegrity – reuploaded and nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (^talk/_edits) 04:23, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- heylenny (^talk/_edits) 04:23, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:36, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely an interesting use of this technique Cmao20 (talk) 12:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vibrant night shot with dynamic light trails, technically very good. -- Radomianin (talk) 01:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 16:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:04.11.1966. Mireille Mathieu. (1966) - 53Fi3030.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 23:17:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1960-1969
Info created by André Cros - preserved by Toulouse City Archives – uploaded by Donna Nobot – restored and nominated by Groupir ! -- Groupir ! (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice picture of singer Mireille Mathieu in her debut year. Simple but efficient composition. Fine chiaroscuro. The image depicts well her original frailty at the beginning of her career, through the posture, the eyes, and the place in the frame. -- Groupir ! (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tangopaso (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 13:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apogónido (Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-17, DD 150.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 18:43:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Apogonidae (Cardinalfishes)
Info Five-lined cardinalfish (Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus), Red Sea, Egypt. It is widespread throughout the tropical waters of the Indo-Pacific region including the Red Sea. It can reach a maximum size of 13 centimetres (5.1 in) in length. Note: there is only one FP of a different genus (a cardinalfish) in the whole order Kurtiformes. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 18:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be nice if there could have been more contrast between the fish and the seabed, but colors are/were what they are/were, and this is an impressive detailed view of a small and quite striking fish. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:01, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality and composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cesena - Abbazia di Santa Maria del Monte - Interno - Cupola ottagonale - 2025-09-29 19-58-00 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 17:36:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info The natural light, filtered through eight windows, gently shapes the surfaces, revealing the decorative details of the vaults and cornices. The choice of a 15mm wide-angle lens amplifies the monumentality of the space without excessive distortion, maintaining a balance between documentary accuracy and visual impact. From a documentary perspective, the shot captures not only the architectural structure but also the spiritual atmosphere of the place. The octagon, a symbol of rebirth and the transition between earth and sky, is here rendered with a clarity that facilitates its iconographic and architectural reading and reinforces the purity or perhaps better to say the simplicity of the composition skillfully decorated by Giuseppe Milani (1773 - 1774). CUN by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-composed view with natural light; wide-angle perspective conveys monumentality without distortion. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very detailed shot and accurately executed, nice work! --Syntaxys (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others, but if you can find out any of the names of the fresco painters, please add that information in the file description and categories. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:01, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The frescos were made by the painter Giuseppe Milani (Giuseppe Milani (Q98768241)) in 1774. An Assunzione della Vergine (Assumption of Mary) is represented on the dome. The dome itself was designed by the architect Francesco Borboni and realised starting from 1771. The article on it.wiki Abbazia di Santa Maria del Monte is quite accurate. This book (in Italian) seems the main source on the artwotk. --Harlock81 (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support heylenny (^talk/_edits) 04:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:00, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Huge wow Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 13:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalyan Minaret, Bukhara (Минарет Калян в Бухаре, Minorai Kalon).jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 07:50:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Uzbekistan
Info Kalyan Minaret, Bukhara (Минарет Калян в Бухаре, Minorai Kalon). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 07:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 07:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:53, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bigger than it has to be and quite impressive! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Сјајно. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support great light, sharp, high rez, good composition. Impressive indeed! --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:00, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I assume that this is the result of a panaroma stich, could you please document that in the description page? Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco No, it's single shot. Mile (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~75 MPx out of a 20 MPx camera, that confirms my first impression that the image was upscaled. Why?~~ Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco do you sometime use Wikipedia ? I even write all on Wikipedia, you dont have to search around. Click picture, see camera, click on my model and read that page. Thank you. Mile (talk) 19:14, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki... what? sorry, no clue, but surely you can teach me. Still, noise is present and level of detail (when looking in full res) is not the best. Poco a poco (talk) 19:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think Mile is referring to this: "the camera rapidly captures 8 images (Tripod) or 16 images (Handheld) which are combined into 160 Mpx (tripod) or 320 MPx (handheld) of data, which the camera combines into 80 MPx (10368×7776 px) images in tripod mode or 50 MPx (8160×6120 px) image in handheld mode." Which, if I understand corrrectly, means the camera does the stitching for you. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco already know that. That is why his reaction is strange to me. Poco was at least dozen of times on my Hi-Res shots. Mile (talk) 01:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:34, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:36, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be even better if you could remove this ugly green box. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In one case i can try to recolor it to more neutral. Hard to erase it, i dont know the covered part. Will see. Mile (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd leave it alone. It's a minor detail that shows that Bukhara is a modern city. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:13, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:25, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Umarxon III (talk) 07:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC).[reply]

File:Hans' Millions 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 22:29:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by General Film Co.– uploaded by Racconish – restored by Ezarate and PaulDallas72 nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Good restoration work. JayCubby (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 02:40, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm unconvinced by the restoration work. If you look at File:Hans' Millions.jpg, the same texture of color dotting is used all the way to the holes, and does not become blurred in the places shown on the allegedly restored file. The details in the original are clearer than in the alleged restoration. I therefore consider this not a real restoration but a version that never existed, and I'm afraid I have to Oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd add that the "PNG restored" is more faithful to the original than this JPG is, although it retains some scratches. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:33, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose fully agree with Ikan here Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The original has a stich error, the process to solve it may be generated the issues --Ezarateesteban 13:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How come only one person agrees with me and this is passing? I'm surprised. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support heylenny (^talk/_edits) 04:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:33, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ehrenfels Castle - 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 17:49:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Hesse
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- imehling (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. Wolverine X-eye 03:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality and interesting motif. But overall quite common regarding the castels category. The lighting is unfavorable, so there are hardly any shadows making the ruin plastic. So the castle barely stands out from the background. It's not outstanding enough for me. --Milseburg (talk) 09:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Milseburg --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Milseburg-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 23:23, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree. The lack of contrast greatly mars the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:34, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just goes to show how different opinions can be. I really like the fact that the castle's colours blend into those of the hill. It makes it look camouflaged, like an animal about to strike. I find this picture imposing and subtly beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 12:43, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Milseburg --Alexander-93 (talk) 16:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auto-Union Typ C IAA 2025 DSC 2008.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 15:50:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info The image shows an Auto-Union Typ C race car exhibited at Munich Motor Show 2025. Created by Alexander-93 – uploaded by Alexander-93 – nominated by Alexander-93 -- Alexander-93 (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexander-93 (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:41, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dust spot near the trunk, it could use some sharpening Poco a poco (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, well-composed. The moiré-inducing background is a shame, though. JayCubby (talk) 18:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image documents the car clearly and effectively. The framing is slightly tight on the left and right, and a small crop at the top could help reduce the moiré from the screen in the background. A slight crop at the bottom might also harmonize the overall composition without cutting off any important details. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tend to agree with Radomianin. Alex, I know you do a lot of very tight crops... at QI I don't think it's a big issue, but here the extra space is needed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Himalayan Tahr at Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 15:06:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
Info created and uploaded by Pratap Gurung – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support no FPs of this species. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good capture. Wolverine X-eye 03:37, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 06:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blurring added afterwards causes problems at the transitions from the fur to the sky. I would have cropped out the bush on the left. Sadly, the eyes are not really sharp either.--Ermell (talk) 08:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the bush should be cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:27, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek and Ermell: cropped out the bush. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Notable improvement, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell. It looks overprocessed to me Poco a poco (talk) 17:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Striking photo but in my opinion unfavourable light conditions lead to too harsh contrasts, and I don't think the image quality is very high. Cmao20 (talk) 12:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20: I have tried to soften the contrast. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 04:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Works for me – quality is not perfect, but I like the posture and the simple, but effective composition against the sky. – Aristeas (talk) 13:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell --Cvmontuy (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Historic Pagoda Style Architecture in Kathmandu Durbar Square-IMG 4069.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 03:45:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Nepal
Info The multi-tiered pagoda roof of the Tribhuvan Museum complex located within Kathmandu Durbar Square, a UNESCO World Heritage Site in Nepal. The structure, featuring five layered roofs with red fabric trim, represents the traditional Newar architectural style that developed during the Malla period. created by Bijay Chuarasia – uploaded by Bijay Chuarasia – nominated by Bijay Chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 03:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 03:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image describes the architectural style very well, but I would like to see more of the carvings or decorations on the roof supports. The shadow drawing should be raised a little more, as the image is nothing special in my opinion and the image description "… the intricate woodwork …" is not correct in its current form. IMO it would also be important to include the name of the pagoda. --Syntaxys (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

-Thank for review, I have updated the info -Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In a similar vein, I would ask whether there's any time of day when the interesting carvings under each tier are at least somewhat lit. This is a great motif, but I can scarcely see those carvings, and I'd like to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:40, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good quality, and useful image, but I don't get a "wow" from this. The blank sky, left-crop, and overall squarish aspect ration on a vertical subject are, I think, holding it back from FP for me, sorry. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:05, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 17:49, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:15, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ОУ „Христијан Тодоровски Карпош“ - Челопек 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 20:37:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice motif Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The photographer has thought through this scene to make a balanced, quality image but IMHO, it does not have sufficient wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:32, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 06:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Partially per GRDN711 but mostly because of the low level of detail. The file is too big (MBs) for that resolution. Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded a new version with minor processing, which has significantly higher level of detail (please compare the new version with the old version). --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've really struggled with whether to vote on this nomination. I really respect what strikes me as the idea behind the photo, which is to show a motif that features classic monumental elements amid shapes formed from splashes of faded color, as part of a general atmosphere of drabness and dilapidation. My thoughts are that maybe it deserves to be featured because of its poetry, but maybe there is not enough to see for it to be worth a feature. I keep going back and forth and have not decided, but maybe the very fact that I keep thinking about it is a reason to support... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note that it's still a functioning school building. There are even social distancing feet in front of the entrance that were placed during the COVID-19 pandemic, which are visible on this picture. I was unsure whether to nominate this one for its interesting architectural style (porticos are not very common for school buildings) or the other one for its story-telling, but eventually decided to go with this one as the motif is missing from the FP gallery on architectural elements. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:59, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the poetry and social commentary from the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The charm of decay, indeed a poetic and moving photo (considering that this school is still in use without the urgently needed restoration). A bit soft esp. at the bottom, but OK. – Aristeas (talk) 13:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:20250502 Bäckerstraße 7 Vienna 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 15:45:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info created, uploadedand nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see some red CA at the margins of windows, etc. Otherwise good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:32, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but it needs more categories. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 05:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hen Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis), Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey, USA.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 23:05:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aythya
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Needsmoreritalin -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- There are currently no FPs of the Lesser Scaup, this will a female of the species to the gallery. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure about this one. Her head and neck are sharp, but unlike the other photo, the rest of her body isn't. Unquestionably a QI, but I'm not sure about FP. Per w:Lesser scaup, "Adults are 38–48 cm (15–19 in) long," so not tiny. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful warm light, perfect focus on the eye, as appropriate, silky soft foreground and background bokeh. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree with Ikan that it's abit of a shame that the body isn't in focus, but still very good Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 11-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 04:56:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Switzerland
Info Reformed earth church in Scuol high on a rock plateau above the Inn River. Heritage status class A protected monument Switzerland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful composition. I personally love (and prefer) this other image of the church by you more, even if the current nom captures the church's seemingly precarious cliff location better. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks almost like a painting - calm composition and lovely mood, even if the light is a bit pale. I agree with UnpetitproleX, the other photo is even stronger. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks a bit too warm for me but overall nice combo and subject Poco a poco (talk) 06:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 10:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant composition and nice autumn colours Cmao20 (talk) 19:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support heylenny (^talk/_edits) 02:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In my eyes the picture of the day is superior becaues of the light. --Milseburg (talk) 09:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation: We made this "standing photo" to show the church in the context of the rock formation above the Inn River on which the church is built.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I would say the 3rd one is better shot, but i wish to see it in snow in morning cold mist. --Mile (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support. We had to choose between those two photos and felt this one had a slightly better viewing angle.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris - Colonne de Juillet - vues du sud - 2025-10-10 22-19-28 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 20:56:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info The July Column is a monumental column erected in the Place de la Bastille in Paris to commemorate the July Revolution of 1830. Difficult to photograph due to its enormous size, I preferred to merge ~~six~~ seven photos vertically. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very decent quality image, but for such a famous / banal monument, the shadows are too prominent, in my opinion. Compare with other photos in the same Category:Colonne de Juillet -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not a banal monument to me, ~~but otherwise, Oppose per Basile. I'd like more light on the base and in the shadowy area near the top of the column.~~ -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not trivial for me too: as soon as possible, I'm going to lighten the shadows, this should mitigate what is described above. Terragio67 (talk) 11:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded, Terragio67 (talk) 12:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm impressed. You can even read the names. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:44, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support the updated version, it is much better now - thank you for the improvement! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding for me because of the extremely high resolution and quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:32, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good improvement. Opposing vote struck out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree Sorry Terragio67, but please check your background when the statue is replaced by plain blue color. The gradients are wrong, and some artifacts are visible -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to fix it, thanks for spending your time... Terragio67 (talk) 07:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Basile, for your careful observation! I haven't noticed the artifacts myself - they may have resulted from the initial selection, but Terragio67 can easily address them. I appreciate both your feedback and Terragio67's effort in improving the image. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin, @Ikan Kekek, @Radomianin. I just finished the necessary changes Basile requested. Thanks everyone.
New version uploaded. Terragio67 (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks very good to me; I can't detect any artifacts anymore. Many thanks for your efforts in the redevelopment from the raw data. By the way, the lateral light is much more prominent in this new version and gives the column a beautiful sense of plasticity. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, very good. I'm still not sure it's an FP, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very well done. – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Стаклењак, Ботаничка башта Јевремовац (greenhouse Jevremovac Botanical Garden, Belgrade, Serbia).jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 19:46:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Serbia
Info Greenhouse in Jevremovac Botanical Garden, Belgrade, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support unusual POV but definitely works for me. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The more I look at it, the more I like it. For me there is no reason not to support it. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 02:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:37, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great for a drone pic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:34, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it works for a seventh support Cmao20 (talk) 11:05, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greater Caucasus Range, Caucasus Mountains, Dombay, Karachay-Cherkessia.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 11:00:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
Info Greater Caucasus Range between the Dombay-Ulgen and Amanauz valleys. The peaks and glaciers of Dzhuguturlyuchat, Amanauz, Sofrudzhu, and Belalakaya. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 11:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is an FP candidate currently running which focuses solely on the Dzhuguturlyuchat massif, but this one presents a panoramic view of a distinctive bend in the Greater Caucasus Range with many peaks and glaciers in the Dombay-Ulgen and Amanauz realms. This 8-10 km stretch of the range is remarkable for its average prominence of over 2 km, reaching up to 2.2 km in places. -- Argenberg (talk) 11:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality and good composition, nice illustration of these mountains Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great mountain, but as a FP it's too hazy, in my view. The light is dull, and the colors blueish. Perhaps another angle of view would make this image more special -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Agree Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much hidden by clouds. --Milseburg (talk) 10:19, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose uncorrected red chromatic aberration -- Gower (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question Where are you seeing an appreciable amount of CA? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This confuses me too. I'm just not seeing it. Cmao20 (talk) 12:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Sulzenauferner 2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 11:35:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
Info The glacier Sulzenauferner in the Stubai Alps and surrounding mountains. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but there are at least 2 dust spots in the sky (in the middle) Poco a poco (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the hint. I cleaned the sky. Feel free to leave a note, if there are spots left. Milseburg (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diesel locomotive and what seems like an endless line of hopper cars on tracks in Lamar, Colorado LCCN2015632680.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 10:41:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#United States
Info created by Carol M. Highsmith, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 10:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great perspective and combo but when you look at it in full res you get disappointed. The res is big, but still Poco a poco (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, it's too unsharp in full resolution and even while regarding a smaller version. --Milseburg (talk) 12:36, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:NASA Apollo 17 Lunar Roving Vehicle.jpg (delist and replace)

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 10:18:50

Info To be replaced by a higher resolution version (Original nomination)
Info It should be placed in Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space exploration ground vehicles
Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 10:18, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rusty-flanked Treecreeper in Senchal Wildlife Sanctuary May 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 10.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 06:43:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Certhiidae_(Treecreepers)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:43, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:43, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot. Wolverine X-eye 10:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I disagree, not a big bird (12-13 cm) but I would still expect more detail Poco a poco (talk) 11:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pseudoleon superbus Coacalco 20251018p1.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2025 at 05:00:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 05:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 05:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pearl Mist.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 16:22:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info Older image (2011), but excellent composition, and technical quality is still very good for the age. The image shows the Pearl Mist, a cruise ship launched in 2014, at the Shelburne Shipyard in Nova Scotia, Canada, during a period when the completed ship was docked pending a legal dispute. Created by Dennis G. Jarvis – uploaded by X-Weinzar – nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not bad. Wolverine X-eye 16:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:SulWitaCollage.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 13:56:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Sequences (Chronological)
Info created by Polinova, William Thein, and Ingela Kaersvang – uploaded by Polinova – nominated by Polinova -- Polinova (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Polinova (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A series of full-sized images as a set would be better, but we don't have that, and this collage is good and educational. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:04, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting to observe Poco a poco (talk) 11:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Земјен пат на Козјак.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 09:49:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not that interesting a scene, and color noise in the clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vihren & Kutelo Pirin Mountains Bulgaria 2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 05:32:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Bulgaria
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The last sunrays of the day illuminating the majestic peaks of Vihren and Kutelo in the Pirin Mountains of Bulgaria —kallerna (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but there are a few striations toward the upper left corner in the sky. What are those? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see any special striations. Maybe you can provide a note on the img? —kallerna (talk) 08:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I added a note. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I think those are natural, but they can be edited out also if you think they are a problem. —kallerna (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support If you think they're natural, that's good enough for me. I just wanted to know what they were. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm not seeing anything either. Good image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloeiwijze van een Rostrinucula dependens. 11-10-2025. (d.j.b).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 04:41:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Lamiaceae
Info Inflorescence of a Rostrinucula dependens. This subshrub is native to China and blooms from August to October. Focus stack of 54 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 05:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! Bokeh background is green plants? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support. The background is pure nature, namely our lawn (grass).--Famberhorst (talk) 09:08, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Terragio67 (talk) 09:44, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vibrant! Wolverine X-eye 16:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eravikulam National Park-WUS07189.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 03:18:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#India
Info created and uploaded by Rainer Halama – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine shot. Wolverine X-eye 16:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:52, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you have used somewhat too much noise reduction? I see borders on some of the hills and trees in the distance, and the terraces in the middleground and hills a bit further back also seem a bit distorted. I'd love for you to try moving the slider back a little on the noise reduction, if you indeed used it, so we can see whether it makes this landscape look more normal. I don't know if anyone else will see things the way I do, of course. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't edit it, and I actually think it wasn't edited, but @Rainer Halama: can give us a definitive answer. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bengal tiger in Sanjay Dubri Tiger Reserve December 2024 by Tisha Mukherjee 11.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2025 at 02:57:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species_:_Panthera_tigris_(Tigers)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 02:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 02:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support great expression on the tiger. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:20, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one! Beautiful tiger, well captured. (To me, its expression is very cat-like.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little noisy but fantastic shot! --Polinova (talk) 14:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:55, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Healthy looking cat! Wolverine X-eye 16:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imperial Sand Dunes2C Southeastern California LCCN2013630449.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2025 at 20:22:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#California
Info created by Carol Highsmith – uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 20:22, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great shot by Highsmith. -- JayCubby (talk) 20:22, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 22:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful movements formed by nature.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Famberhorst. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love Highsmith's work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a high quality image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolverine X-eye (talk • contribs) 16:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 05:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:017 Hyacinth macaw flying in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2025 at 06:26:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_Parrots)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Umarxon III (talk) 07:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 07:51, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would put Light on Blue a bit down, but much more on Green and some Highligths down. --Mile (talk) 08:06, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing capture! Wolverine X-eye 16:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 18:22, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Impressive! JayCubby (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 05:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norderney, Tonnenleger "Norden" -- 2025 -- 9137.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2025 at 06:11:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 06:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I've always wondered how the big buoys are placed. (sometimes, I wish there were fewer of them, because it's not fun to dodge buoys when sailing.) JayCubby (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful moment.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:38, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:King Christian X in Copenhagen 1940.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2025 at 01:17:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1900s#1940-1949 – uploaded by Doug Wilson~commonswiki – nominated by Chorchapu -- Chorchapu (talk) 01:17, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is my first ever Featured Picture nomination so apologies if I'm doing anything wrong. I was looking through the Wikipedia article for w:King Christian X and saw a colorised version of this photograph. It's admittedly lacking in quality but I think it makes up for it with the historical significance. -- Chorchapu (talk) 01:17, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, it could be a FP, but not with this quality. Sadly, I couldn't find a higher resolution version with Google Images or Tineye. Yann (talk) 13:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. Might be a VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. --Milseburg (talk) 11:39, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stained Glass Coat of Arms dated 1764, Castello Sforzesco, Milan.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 21:44:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info created by Julian Lupyan – uploaded by Julian Lupyan – nominated by Julian Lupyan -- Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hello everybody, this is my first nomination. I'd like to say I'm aware that there is a bit of a lack of detail (the lighting situation was a little strange), but I really liked the composition and would appreciate all comments and advice. -- Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome to FPC, Julian - a wonderful start! A thoughtful and refreshing first nomination. The composition works well - the stained glass and the blurred glimpse of the building beyond create an intriguing depth. Well seen, and thank you for this wonderful idea. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:14, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the kind welcome! Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:21, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~That white etiquette doesnt help. I would color it black.~~ --Mile (talk) 08:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Improvement proposed Good point, Mile. @Julian, I took the liberty of removing the label and, while I was at it, I made some slight adjustments to the contrast and tone values. This is just a suggestion and is available via the SwissTransfer link. If you like it, feel free to use the edit for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:35, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Done @Mile @User:Radomianin Changes adopted, I think this is a great edit. Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I like this photo in this edit and I'm considering supporting the nomination. Could you add information about the dimensions of the stained glass to your file description? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, please add information about the artwork. --Yann (talk) 07:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support New to me. --Mile (talk) 07:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinking building in Montmartre.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 15:38:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others
Info created by Tangopaso – uploaded by Tangopaso – nominated by Tangopaso -- Tangopaso (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tangopaso (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A creative take on photographing a normal building, but since this is more of a trick photo than a proper representation of an actual event, the gallery should also reflect this. Funny and fanciful image names are ok for Flickr or Instagram, but the policy is that Commons images should be properly named and categorized. There are plenty of building really unstable in some way, so it should be clear to the viewer what's going on here. We don't need to spread more misinformation in the world, there is plenty of that already. --Cart (talk) 16:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I dont understand your comment. Its obvious that it is an actual building, you have even the location of the building in Paris. It is not an unstable building. It is only a joke.

If you want in Commons only photos of actual objects, you must forbid all the art, paintings, drawings, sculptures. Does Wikipédia understand humor?--Tangopaso (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course we can have jokes, humor and such things here, but the description, file names and galleries should be correct since that is how people find images here. If you call this a 'sinking building', it will come up in searches people make for actual sinking buildings. If you indicate in the title and description that it's a funny joke photo, then people who are looking for funny photos will find it. With the right words, your photo will find the right audience. --Cart (talk) 21:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question The resolution (6 MPx) is low, don't you have more pixels to offer? Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~No sorry, I dont have --Tangopaso (talk) 08:20, 17 October 2025 (UTC)~~[reply]

I uploaded an image with better definitionː 3.38 Mb instead of 2.18 Mb. I hope it will be OK. --Tangopaso (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 20:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logan Square; Spring Garden.png

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 14:47:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#United States
Info created by Szeremeta – uploaded by Szeremeta – nominated by Szeremeta -- Szeremeta (talk) 14:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Szeremeta (talk) 14:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 15:53, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not even QI to me, lack of detail, noisy lack of perspective correction and random compo. Definitely no FP Poco a poco (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't think perspective correction was demanded from drone photos. I do agree that we've seen much sharper and less noisy drone pics, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's a 100 megapixel file. It's not comparable to a 100 megapixel medium-format image, but impressive for a drone shot, one can even read the building names! Comparisons with other drone images should be done at the same resolution / print size, not at 100% --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:43, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're right, so I'll Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:38, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The embedded color profile is Adobe RGB, which often gives wrong results with web browsers. File:Logan Square, Spring Garden.jpg is a JPEG version with sRGB color profile. You can add it as alternative. Yann (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is that still an issue with modern browsers? I thought that the Chrome/Firefox/Safari releases from the last few years had no issues displaying Adobe RGB images, as long as there was an embedded profile. I often use Adobe RGB in images with dark greens to reduce posterisation when converting to an 8-bit JPEG. Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asbury Park Oceanfront Aerial (October 15, 2025).png

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 14:43:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#United States
Info created by Szeremeta – uploaded by Szeremeta – nominated by Szeremeta -- Szeremeta (talk) 14:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Szeremeta (talk) 14:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 15:55, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this one is good. Please remind me of the advantages of JPEGs over PNGs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
PNGs
- take up much more space
- MW's thumbnail generator blurs PNG thumbnails (and nobody's fixed that bug for decadeS if my memory serves me)
JayCubby (talk) 22:58, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know. If these don’t pass I’ll be sure to retry as JPEGs. Szeremeta (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The embedded color profile is Adobe RGB, which often gives wrong results with web browsers. File:Asbury Park Oceanfront Aerial (October 15, 2025).jpg is a JPEG version with sRGB color profile. You can add it as alternative. Yann (talk) 07:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weißes Haus, agra-Park, Markkleeberg, 1708230939, ako.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 11:12:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Saxony
Info No FPs of this place. Harmonious composition. created by Code – uploaded by Code – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The spots in the sky should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 13:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition. Szeremeta (talk) 14:55, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:27, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Peaceful, and even more than the building, the weeping willow is the star of the photo. I think you should add a category for it and maybe also for the tree just to the right of the building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 20:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:01, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nybrokajen Blasieholmen Stockholm 2016 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 11:12:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
Info No FPs of this place. I love the light. created by Julian Herzog – uploaded by Julian Herzog – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 12:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Szeremeta (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 15:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:18, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, that light and look is a signature of Julian Herzog, who's one of my favorite photographers on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:01, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castle Pfalzgrafenstein - Kaub - 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 10:37:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info created by imehling -- imehling (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I hope this castle is outstanding enough. -- imehling (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:18, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Szeremeta (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, for me the image doesn't work well enough for FP. The building ist too bright (maybe fixable) and it doesn't stand out enough from the background. --Alexander-93 (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I concur, sorry, not the best POV Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meadow in the Smoky Mountains (41665h).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 02:14:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Tennessee
Info Meadow in the Great Smoky Mountains (in the morning, amid the namesake "smoke"), Tennessee. Debated whether to nominate this one or the one taken a bit later in the day, but the one with the "smoke" seemed more fitting, even if the lighting is unusual for FPC. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:14, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:14, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for nominating this image and not the other one, I learned a lot from it. I often shy away from compositions with a subject in the shadows against a bright background, but here it works beautifully. Like in this or that painting, the viewer is guided first through the shadow, creating context, and then into the light, adding contrast. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Evokes the quiet atmosphere of a Théodore Rousseau landscape - serene, misty, and beautifully balanced. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:34, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 09:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 12:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely stunning. Szeremeta (talk) 14:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Julesvernex2 (thank you for emphasising the instructive ‘dark subject against a bright background’ point!) and Radomianin. Like you, I am reminded of landscape paintings by this composition. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:05, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. The beauty and rhythm of the wildflowers in the foreground shouldn't be ignored as one of the elements that makes this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The smoke in the background adds to the composition. Wolverine X-eye 16:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Love the lighting and composition; very painterly. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-legged grasshopper (72625).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2025 at 02:10:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Acrididae_(Short-horned_grasshoppers_and_locusts)
Info Red-legged grasshopper (Melanoplus femurrubrum) munching on a flower, covered in pollen (grasshoppers are pollinators, too!). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Natural, well-balanced sharpness that feels effortless and authentic. The visible pollen detail greatly enhances the picture's encyclopedic value. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support f/8 is safe too. --Mile (talk) 09:22, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, what a harmonious composition and extraordinarily good image quality Cmao20 (talk) 11:16, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:16, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exquisite. Wolverine X-eye 14:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool stuff Poco a poco (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. Very impressive and instructive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 18:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malcolm X 1964 press photo.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 23:19:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1960-1969
Info created by AP News – uploaded by 999real – nominated by Bremps -- Bremps... 23:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- High quality shot of his face, illustrates his defiant attitude, high historical value Bremps... 23:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking portrait with an almost low-key feel: precise shadows, expressive face, and a calm dark background conveying depth and subtle drama. -- Radomianin (talk) 01:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 01:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Its good shot, but i miss some exposure. --Mile (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info We have one previous FP of him. --Cart (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, but this one is much better. --Yann (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It was just a statement/information, nothing more, to have something to compare with and I agree with you. --Cart (talk) 16:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad we have both, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 07:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 08:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--JustEMV (talk) 16:47, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbanegra rayado (Oxycheilinus digramma), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-24, DD 51.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 20:57:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Labridae (Wrasses)
Info Cheek-lined wrasse (Oxycheilinus digramma), Anilao, Philippines. This species of wrasse is native to the Indian Ocean and the western Pacific Ocean and lives in coral reefs, sheltered inland areas, and lagoons, possibly at depths from 3 to 60 metres (9.8 to 196.9 ft). It can grow to about 40 centimetres (16 in) in standard length, the coloring varies from pale gray to purple, and it eats sea urchins, molluscs, and crustaceans. Note: there are no FPs of the genus Oxycheilinus on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great details at and beyond life size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:48, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:07, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:15, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:28, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calanque de l'Erevine.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 15:06:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#France
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Limestone cliffs, turquoise waters, and the railway viaduct of Calanque de l’Érevine, a picturesque coastal inlet on the Côte Bleue in southern France —kallerna (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful photo of a scene that runs a high vertical gamut. I may have missed it, but you might want to say where you took the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I added the geolocation. —kallerna (talk) 04:09, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Beautiful contrast between turquoise sea and sky, vivid yet natural tones. -- Radomianin (talk) 00:48, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good view, but center is overexposed, white stones. --Mile (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should be quite realistic considering the scene. —kallerna (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:14, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I would have liked to see more on the right. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Something like this? —kallerna (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I would definitely support that picture (and prefer it over the nom), with maybe slightly more crop on left. Beautiful place and picture. Alternatively, you could change this nom to Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges (since the bridge is the hero here, imo) and nominate the other one for Places/Others#France. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Gun to my head, I'd pick the other one, but I think they are different enough for both to be FPs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMO 8408480 - Florian.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 14:35:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 16:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harmonious composition, nice ship. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:28, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - This is a technically good picture of a particular tugboat but doesn't show it in action. QI, VI yes, but IMO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree, too static/centered Poco a poco (talk) 17:24, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Црква „Св. Троица“ - Добрача 7.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 11:22:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info There are relatively well-preserved decorations on both sides of the aedicule, on the mullion's capital and on the tracery. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment perhaps a bit underexposed? But nice subject and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmao20: I've uploaded a brighter version by 1 EV. How does it look now? --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support now Cmao20 (talk) 13:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Still kind of dull light and not that sharp or striking to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:40, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose That mix of old archicture and modern bricks is of no help, I'm afraid. Poco a poco (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your opinions. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marie Goldsmith (retouched).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 09:35:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1910-1919
Info Photograph taken by Pierre Choumoff – retouched by ReneeWrites – originally uploaded by Grnrchst – nominated by Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator. -- Grnrchst (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. JayCubby (talk) 14:58, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quite small, poor quality. We have thousands of pictures like this on Commons. What is special here? Yann (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:023 Yacare caiman sunbathing in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 09:13:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Alligatoridae_(Alligators_and_Caimans)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexis Lours (talk) 09:17, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 11:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. I can see three FPs of this species in the category, but that's not too many, and this one is probably the best yet Cmao20 (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality + compo. JayCubby (talk) 14:59, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. Wolverine X-eye 17:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 02:00, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality, compo so-so. Center position of head isnt favourable but probably you want that second croc head too. --Mile (talk) 08:24, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:54, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 13:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:39, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common Swift 2025 07 18 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 08:47:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Order : Apodiformes (Hummingbirds and Swifts)
Info A common swift (Apus apus) in flight, created by Alexis Lours – uploaded by Alexis Lours – nominated by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:49, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - One of the fastest birds in the world makes for a hard capture. Nice. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thanks for giving us that context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Rhododendrites' context. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - --GRDN711 (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)--GRDN711 (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:08, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common tern 2025 07 08 08.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 08:41:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Sterna
Info A common tern (Sterna hirundo) in flight with a fish, created by Alexis Lours – uploaded by Alexis Lours – nominated by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Absolutely superb Cmao20 (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 02:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:30, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:20, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 03:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing nectaring position of Aulocera brahminus (Blanchard, 1853) - Narrow-banded Satyr ANK8120.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 07:45:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Aulocera
Info created by Ankit0908 – uploaded by Ankit0908 – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 07:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 07:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. Composition is absolutely beautiful and I was preparing to support but looking at it in full size the quality is poor (pixellated and noisy) Cmao20 (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will try sir Ankit0908 (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have uploaded less noisy image, please check. Ankit0908 (talk) 04:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perhaps the noise has been sharpened? Ankit0908, can this be fixed? JayCubby (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
May be, I Will try to fixed shortly. Ankit0908 (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have uploaded less noisy image, please check. Ankit0908 (talk) 04:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Improved. I'm no longer sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Light trails in Centro de Gramado at night (25415341663).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2025 at 04:23:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Light trails
Info created by Felipe Valduga – 1st uploaded by Sintegrity – reuploaded and nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (^talk/_edits) 04:23, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- heylenny (^talk/_edits) 04:23, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:36, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely an interesting use of this technique Cmao20 (talk) 12:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vibrant night shot with dynamic light trails, technically very good. -- Radomianin (talk) 01:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 16:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:04.11.1966. Mireille Mathieu. (1966) - 53Fi3030.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 23:17:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1960-1969
Info created by André Cros - preserved by Toulouse City Archives – uploaded by Donna Nobot – restored and nominated by Groupir ! -- Groupir ! (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice picture of singer Mireille Mathieu in her debut year. Simple but efficient composition. Fine chiaroscuro. The image depicts well her original frailty at the beginning of her career, through the posture, the eyes, and the place in the frame. -- Groupir ! (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tangopaso (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 13:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apogónido (Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-17, DD 150.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 18:43:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Apogonidae (Cardinalfishes)
Info Five-lined cardinalfish (Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus), Red Sea, Egypt. It is widespread throughout the tropical waters of the Indo-Pacific region including the Red Sea. It can reach a maximum size of 13 centimetres (5.1 in) in length. Note: there is only one FP of a different genus (a cardinalfish) in the whole order Kurtiformes. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 18:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be nice if there could have been more contrast between the fish and the seabed, but colors are/were what they are/were, and this is an impressive detailed view of a small and quite striking fish. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:01, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality and composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cesena - Abbazia di Santa Maria del Monte - Interno - Cupola ottagonale - 2025-09-29 19-58-00 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 17:36:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info The natural light, filtered through eight windows, gently shapes the surfaces, revealing the decorative details of the vaults and cornices. The choice of a 15mm wide-angle lens amplifies the monumentality of the space without excessive distortion, maintaining a balance between documentary accuracy and visual impact. From a documentary perspective, the shot captures not only the architectural structure but also the spiritual atmosphere of the place. The octagon, a symbol of rebirth and the transition between earth and sky, is here rendered with a clarity that facilitates its iconographic and architectural reading and reinforces the purity or perhaps better to say the simplicity of the composition skillfully decorated by Giuseppe Milani (1773 - 1774). CUN by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-composed view with natural light; wide-angle perspective conveys monumentality without distortion. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very detailed shot and accurately executed, nice work! --Syntaxys (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others, but if you can find out any of the names of the fresco painters, please add that information in the file description and categories. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:01, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The frescos were made by the painter Giuseppe Milani (Giuseppe Milani (Q98768241)) in 1774. An Assunzione della Vergine (Assumption of Mary) is represented on the dome. The dome itself was designed by the architect Francesco Borboni and realised starting from 1771. The article on it.wiki Abbazia di Santa Maria del Monte is quite accurate. This book (in Italian) seems the main source on the artwotk. --Harlock81 (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support heylenny (^talk/_edits) 04:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:00, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Huge wow Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 13:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalyan Minaret, Bukhara (Минарет Калян в Бухаре, Minorai Kalon).jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 07:50:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Uzbekistan
Info Kalyan Minaret, Bukhara (Минарет Калян в Бухаре, Minorai Kalon). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 07:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 07:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:53, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bigger than it has to be and quite impressive! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Сјајно. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support great light, sharp, high rez, good composition. Impressive indeed! --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:00, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I assume that this is the result of a panaroma stich, could you please document that in the description page? Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco No, it's single shot. Mile (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~75 MPx out of a 20 MPx camera, that confirms my first impression that the image was upscaled. Why?~~ Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco do you sometime use Wikipedia ? I even write all on Wikipedia, you dont have to search around. Click picture, see camera, click on my model and read that page. Thank you. Mile (talk) 19:14, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki... what? sorry, no clue, but surely you can teach me. Still, noise is present and level of detail (when looking in full res) is not the best. Poco a poco (talk) 19:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think Mile is referring to this: "the camera rapidly captures 8 images (Tripod) or 16 images (Handheld) which are combined into 160 Mpx (tripod) or 320 MPx (handheld) of data, which the camera combines into 80 MPx (10368×7776 px) images in tripod mode or 50 MPx (8160×6120 px) image in handheld mode." Which, if I understand corrrectly, means the camera does the stitching for you. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco already know that. That is why his reaction is strange to me. Poco was at least dozen of times on my Hi-Res shots. Mile (talk) 01:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:34, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:36, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be even better if you could remove this ugly green box. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In one case i can try to recolor it to more neutral. Hard to erase it, i dont know the covered part. Will see. Mile (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd leave it alone. It's a minor detail that shows that Bukhara is a modern city. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:13, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:25, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Umarxon III (talk) 07:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC).[reply]

File:Hans' Millions 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 22:29:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by General Film Co.– uploaded by Racconish – restored by Ezarate and PaulDallas72 nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Good restoration work. JayCubby (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 02:40, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm unconvinced by the restoration work. If you look at File:Hans' Millions.jpg, the same texture of color dotting is used all the way to the holes, and does not become blurred in the places shown on the allegedly restored file. The details in the original are clearer than in the alleged restoration. I therefore consider this not a real restoration but a version that never existed, and I'm afraid I have to Oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd add that the "PNG restored" is more faithful to the original than this JPG is, although it retains some scratches. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:33, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose fully agree with Ikan here Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The original has a stich error, the process to solve it may be generated the issues --Ezarateesteban 13:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How come only one person agrees with me and this is passing? I'm surprised. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support heylenny (^talk/_edits) 04:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:33, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ehrenfels Castle - 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 17:49:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Hesse
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- imehling (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. Wolverine X-eye 03:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality and interesting motif. But overall quite common regarding the castels category. The lighting is unfavorable, so there are hardly any shadows making the ruin plastic. So the castle barely stands out from the background. It's not outstanding enough for me. --Milseburg (talk) 09:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Milseburg --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Milseburg-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 23:23, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree. The lack of contrast greatly mars the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:34, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just goes to show how different opinions can be. I really like the fact that the castle's colours blend into those of the hill. It makes it look camouflaged, like an animal about to strike. I find this picture imposing and subtly beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 12:43, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Milseburg --Alexander-93 (talk) 16:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auto-Union Typ C IAA 2025 DSC 2008.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 15:50:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info The image shows an Auto-Union Typ C race car exhibited at Munich Motor Show 2025. Created by Alexander-93 – uploaded by Alexander-93 – nominated by Alexander-93 -- Alexander-93 (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexander-93 (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:41, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dust spot near the trunk, it could use some sharpening Poco a poco (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, well-composed. The moiré-inducing background is a shame, though. JayCubby (talk) 18:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image documents the car clearly and effectively. The framing is slightly tight on the left and right, and a small crop at the top could help reduce the moiré from the screen in the background. A slight crop at the bottom might also harmonize the overall composition without cutting off any important details. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:45, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tend to agree with Radomianin. Alex, I know you do a lot of very tight crops... at QI I don't think it's a big issue, but here the extra space is needed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Himalayan Tahr at Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 15:06:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
Info created and uploaded by Pratap Gurung – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support no FPs of this species. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good capture. Wolverine X-eye 03:37, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 06:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blurring added afterwards causes problems at the transitions from the fur to the sky. I would have cropped out the bush on the left. Sadly, the eyes are not really sharp either.--Ermell (talk) 08:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the bush should be cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:27, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek and Ermell: cropped out the bush. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Notable improvement, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell. It looks overprocessed to me Poco a poco (talk) 17:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Striking photo but in my opinion unfavourable light conditions lead to too harsh contrasts, and I don't think the image quality is very high. Cmao20 (talk) 12:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20: I have tried to soften the contrast. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 04:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Works for me – quality is not perfect, but I like the posture and the simple, but effective composition against the sky. – Aristeas (talk) 13:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell --Cvmontuy (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Historic Pagoda Style Architecture in Kathmandu Durbar Square-IMG 4069.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 03:45:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Nepal
Info The multi-tiered pagoda roof of the Tribhuvan Museum complex located within Kathmandu Durbar Square, a UNESCO World Heritage Site in Nepal. The structure, featuring five layered roofs with red fabric trim, represents the traditional Newar architectural style that developed during the Malla period. created by Bijay Chuarasia – uploaded by Bijay Chuarasia – nominated by Bijay Chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 03:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 03:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image describes the architectural style very well, but I would like to see more of the carvings or decorations on the roof supports. The shadow drawing should be raised a little more, as the image is nothing special in my opinion and the image description "… the intricate woodwork …" is not correct in its current form. IMO it would also be important to include the name of the pagoda. --Syntaxys (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

-Thank for review, I have updated the info -Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In a similar vein, I would ask whether there's any time of day when the interesting carvings under each tier are at least somewhat lit. This is a great motif, but I can scarcely see those carvings, and I'd like to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:40, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good quality, and useful image, but I don't get a "wow" from this. The blank sky, left-crop, and overall squarish aspect ration on a vertical subject are, I think, holding it back from FP for me, sorry. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:05, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 17:49, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:15, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ОУ „Христијан Тодоровски Карпош“ - Челопек 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 20:37:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice motif Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The photographer has thought through this scene to make a balanced, quality image but IMHO, it does not have sufficient wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:32, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 06:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Partially per GRDN711 but mostly because of the low level of detail. The file is too big (MBs) for that resolution. Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded a new version with minor processing, which has significantly higher level of detail (please compare the new version with the old version). --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've really struggled with whether to vote on this nomination. I really respect what strikes me as the idea behind the photo, which is to show a motif that features classic monumental elements amid shapes formed from splashes of faded color, as part of a general atmosphere of drabness and dilapidation. My thoughts are that maybe it deserves to be featured because of its poetry, but maybe there is not enough to see for it to be worth a feature. I keep going back and forth and have not decided, but maybe the very fact that I keep thinking about it is a reason to support... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note that it's still a functioning school building. There are even social distancing feet in front of the entrance that were placed during the COVID-19 pandemic, which are visible on this picture. I was unsure whether to nominate this one for its interesting architectural style (porticos are not very common for school buildings) or the other one for its story-telling, but eventually decided to go with this one as the motif is missing from the FP gallery on architectural elements. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:59, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the poetry and social commentary from the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The charm of decay, indeed a poetic and moving photo (considering that this school is still in use without the urgently needed restoration). A bit soft esp. at the bottom, but OK. – Aristeas (talk) 13:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:20250502 Bäckerstraße 7 Vienna 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 15:45:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info created, uploadedand nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see some red CA at the margins of windows, etc. Otherwise good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:32, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but it needs more categories. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 05:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:27, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hen Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis), Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey, USA.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 23:05:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aythya
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Needsmoreritalin -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- There are currently no FPs of the Lesser Scaup, this will a female of the species to the gallery. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure about this one. Her head and neck are sharp, but unlike the other photo, the rest of her body isn't. Unquestionably a QI, but I'm not sure about FP. Per w:Lesser scaup, "Adults are 38–48 cm (15–19 in) long," so not tiny. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful warm light, perfect focus on the eye, as appropriate, silky soft foreground and background bokeh. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree with Ikan that it's abit of a shame that the body isn't in focus, but still very good Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 11-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 04:56:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Switzerland
Info Reformed earth church in Scuol high on a rock plateau above the Inn River. Heritage status class A protected monument Switzerland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful composition. I personally love (and prefer) this other image of the church by you more, even if the current nom captures the church's seemingly precarious cliff location better. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks almost like a painting - calm composition and lovely mood, even if the light is a bit pale. I agree with UnpetitproleX, the other photo is even stronger. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks a bit too warm for me but overall nice combo and subject Poco a poco (talk) 06:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 10:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant composition and nice autumn colours Cmao20 (talk) 19:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support heylenny (^talk/_edits) 02:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In my eyes the picture of the day is superior becaues of the light. --Milseburg (talk) 09:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation: We made this "standing photo" to show the church in the context of the rock formation above the Inn River on which the church is built.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I would say the 3rd one is better shot, but i wish to see it in snow in morning cold mist. --Mile (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support. We had to choose between those two photos and felt this one had a slightly better viewing angle.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris - Colonne de Juillet - vues du sud - 2025-10-10 22-19-28 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 20:56:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info The July Column is a monumental column erected in the Place de la Bastille in Paris to commemorate the July Revolution of 1830. Difficult to photograph due to its enormous size, I preferred to merge ~~six~~ seven photos vertically. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very decent quality image, but for such a famous / banal monument, the shadows are too prominent, in my opinion. Compare with other photos in the same Category:Colonne de Juillet -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not a banal monument to me, ~~but otherwise, Oppose per Basile. I'd like more light on the base and in the shadowy area near the top of the column.~~ -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not trivial for me too: as soon as possible, I'm going to lighten the shadows, this should mitigate what is described above. Terragio67 (talk) 11:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded, Terragio67 (talk) 12:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm impressed. You can even read the names. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:44, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support the updated version, it is much better now - thank you for the improvement! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding for me because of the extremely high resolution and quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:32, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good improvement. Opposing vote struck out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree Sorry Terragio67, but please check your background when the statue is replaced by plain blue color. The gradients are wrong, and some artifacts are visible -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to fix it, thanks for spending your time... Terragio67 (talk) 07:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Basile, for your careful observation! I haven't noticed the artifacts myself - they may have resulted from the initial selection, but Terragio67 can easily address them. I appreciate both your feedback and Terragio67's effort in improving the image. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin, @Ikan Kekek, @Radomianin. I just finished the necessary changes Basile requested. Thanks everyone.
New version uploaded. Terragio67 (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks very good to me; I can't detect any artifacts anymore. Many thanks for your efforts in the redevelopment from the raw data. By the way, the lateral light is much more prominent in this new version and gives the column a beautiful sense of plasticity. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, very good. I'm still not sure it's an FP, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very well done. – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Стаклењак, Ботаничка башта Јевремовац (greenhouse Jevremovac Botanical Garden, Belgrade, Serbia).jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 19:46:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Serbia
Info Greenhouse in Jevremovac Botanical Garden, Belgrade, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support unusual POV but definitely works for me. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The more I look at it, the more I like it. For me there is no reason not to support it. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 02:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:37, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great for a drone pic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:34, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it works for a seventh support Cmao20 (talk) 11:05, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greater Caucasus Range, Caucasus Mountains, Dombay, Karachay-Cherkessia.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 11:00:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
Info Greater Caucasus Range between the Dombay-Ulgen and Amanauz valleys. The peaks and glaciers of Dzhuguturlyuchat, Amanauz, Sofrudzhu, and Belalakaya. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 11:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is an FP candidate currently running which focuses solely on the Dzhuguturlyuchat massif, but this one presents a panoramic view of a distinctive bend in the Greater Caucasus Range with many peaks and glaciers in the Dombay-Ulgen and Amanauz realms. This 8-10 km stretch of the range is remarkable for its average prominence of over 2 km, reaching up to 2.2 km in places. -- Argenberg (talk) 11:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality and good composition, nice illustration of these mountains Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great mountain, but as a FP it's too hazy, in my view. The light is dull, and the colors blueish. Perhaps another angle of view would make this image more special -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Agree Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much hidden by clouds. --Milseburg (talk) 10:19, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose uncorrected red chromatic aberration -- Gower (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question Where are you seeing an appreciable amount of CA? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This confuses me too. I'm just not seeing it. Cmao20 (talk) 12:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tabella dei periodi di voto per la regola del quinto giorno (5 giorni dopo la candidatura)

Tue 14 Oct → Sun 19 Oct
Wed 15 Oct → Mon 20 Oct
Thu 16 Oct → Tue 21 Oct
Fri 17 Oct → Wed 22 Oct
Sat 18 Oct → Thu 23 Oct
Sun 19 Oct → Fri 24 Oct

Tabella dei periodi di voto (9 giorni dopo la candidatura)

Fri 10 Oct → Sun 19 Oct
Sat 11 Oct → Mon 20 Oct
Sun 12 Oct → Tue 21 Oct
Mon 13 Oct → Wed 22 Oct
Tue 14 Oct → Thu 23 Oct
Wed 15 Oct → Fri 24 Oct
Thu 16 Oct → Sat 25 Oct
Fri 17 Oct → Sun 26 Oct
Sat 18 Oct → Mon 27 Oct
Sun 19 Oct → Tue 28 Oct